Introduction
• Brief
The case of Tommy Takem, the owner of Takem’s Appliances & Electronics, LLC against Sally Walker is one of a mistreated sales contract. When Sally Walker purchased the laptop from Takem’s Applicances & Electronics, she entered into a sales contract in which she promised to pay for the laptop. The specific terms of the contract are unknown, as to the price Sally agreed to pay Takem for the laptop, the time period over which the payments would be made, if the contract was written or oral, and so on. It is even unknown whether the contract is even valid at this point. Assuming that at the time Sally purchased the laptop, both she and Takem came to an agreement on all terms, thus entering into a sales contract.…
Carter V. Tokai Financial Services, Inc. In the case, it follows Randy P. Carter and Tokai Financial services, Inc. where Tokai sued Carter for money that was not given under a lease agreement that the two had entered. It as stated that ARC made 4 of the rental payments before they defaulted on the obligation they had with Tokai. Following the ceasing of payment, Tokai the repossessed the equipment and sold it for $5,900. After the sale, Tokai brought a suit against in which they were awarded $56,675.74.…
Sacramento County Analysis Sacramento County Alcohol and Drug Treatment Initiative faced many challenges during the implementation process. Bob Caulk and Toni Moore struggled with their staff at Department of Health and Human Services being unwilling to implement and apply the skills from AODTI, for fear of the increased workload and resistance to change. DHHS middle-managers chose not to attend the AODTI training sessions, were not invested in the project, and did not take step to implement the program into their department. Moore became aware that the DHHS staff was not knowledgeable about the AODTI. AODTI team held seminar geared toward middle and top-level management.…
RELATED CASES: None SUPPORT DOCUMENTS: Eight Pages Bank Of America Fraud Affidavit/Transaction History. On 12/09/2015, Sandra Agrait contacted the Pasco Sheriff`s Office by telephone to report fraudulent use of her Bank Of America ATM/Debit Card ending in 5457. Ms. Agrait advised she reviewed her bank account transaction history and observed two unauthorized cash withdrawals that she did not make. She said her houseguest, Timothy Midkiss took her debit card out of her wallet, used it to make the cash withdrawals and returned it to her walle without her knowledge or permission.…
Economics. (19th ed.). McGraw-Hill: Retrieved from website: http://www.icbcclaiminfo.com/node/168 United States District Court, Easter District of New York, United States of America, et al., against American Express Company and American Express Travel Related Services Company, Inc. Nicholas G. Garaufis, United States District Judge. Case 1:10-cv-04496-NGG-RER Document 619 Filed 02/19/15…
She has pointed out the problem in saying how the previous strategies were not successful and then suggested alternatives which have been proven to be effective. By using a call to action in the end of the piece, her arguments have been allowed to be put into practise. From here, the audience is able to understand the significance of the issue and is motivated to make a…
Consideration is additionally a primary component of a lawfully binding contract. In law, this refers to a valuable act or item listed for the stipulated supply. It is often within the sort of cash, a service, reliance on the agreement, or an appointment to refrain from capital punishment a specific action (Beale & Tallon, 2002). supported this description, the agreement between Stan and therefore the couple in question includes a thought. In exchange for holding the automobile for on a daily basis, Jim and Laura in agreement to pay a payment of $100.…
This case is related to a suit filed by Fitl on Mark. Fitl claimed that he was sold an ungradable sports card by Mark. Mark claimed that Fitl did not inform him of this defect on time due to which he was not liable for any damages faced by him. Court decided in favor of Fitl and awarded him $17, 750. When Stark made an appeal in another court, this decision was maintained in favor of Fitl.…
The Aslakson v. Home Saving Association case was very interesting. The Aslakson family joined into a conditional sales contract in order to buy a mobile home. A conditional sales contract is a when an individual signs a contract which allows the individuals to take the property, in this case a mobile home, but will not receive the title until the buyer receive the full purchase amount.…
This question is concerned with the Unfair Contract Act 1977 and how it has been affected by reforms introduced by the Consumer Rights Act 2015. The Consumer Rights Act 2015 reforms the unfair contract terms in consumer contracts. This is covered in part 2 of the Consumers Rights Act which amends the Unfair Contract Terms Act 1977 in relation to business to consumer contracts and cancels the Unfair Terms in Consumer Contracts Regulations 1999.…
It is irrefutable that, to a considerable extent, legal and non-legal actions are effective in administering justice for consumers. Consumer law has continually evolved in order to maintain its ability to protect consumers within the ever-changing modern marketplace - progressing from the common law notion of caveat emptor to an intensive legal framework recognising the fundamental need for consumer protections. While much of this contemporary framework - comprised of statutory bodies, law courts and tribunals, and working in conjunction with a myriad of other non-legal avenues - is highly effective in its delivery of justice, there remain areas of concern currently inadequate in safeguarding rights. Thus, although legal and non-legal measures…
Discussion Points 1. To what extent are CORE Credit Union’s networks as converged? Identify and briefly describe additional network convergence opportunities. A1. The Core Credit Union initially used traditional methods of financial transactions.…
American University Law School’s campus is beautiful; the classrooms are new, spacious, and sometimes well-lit. I was really excited to have the opportunity to sit in a real law school class amongst unrehearsed law students, which would give me an insight into the inner workings of a law school classroom. The experience was rewarding in more ways than one and it also reinforced my plans to attend law school. My expectations were unclear, as I had sat in a Torts class before, but this time I sat in a Contracts class.…
Case 13.3 Kohel v. Bergen Auto Enterprises, LLC Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division, 2013. 2013 WL 439970. Issue: This case involved allegations of breach of contract involving which parties and for what actions?…
Contracts are an integral part of society, having strong legal contractual principles gives confidence to consumers, investors and anyone who wishes to enter into a contract. Entering in a contract shows that in a primitive way that two parties are on the same page, however it is noted that a high proportion of litigation does actually stem from misunderstood contract (Duxbury (2011)).In this scenario Gary believes he has a valid contract with Mike and is disappointed to learn that Mike has sold on the Bike to Liz (third party). Using previous cases as precedent and analysing the conditions in which a contract is made, advice will be given to Gary on his legal position in regards to the contract and whether there is any suitable remedy that…