(iii) Dialogical Multiculturalism:
This actually is different from the former two as it represents the practical level rather than the policy areas. This was primarily developed by Parekh (2000) who suggested “multiculturalism explains well how the cultural communities should relate to one another. It also prioritized that only the norms and values of different cultures within a given context cannot bring about peace and solidarity rather by creating an open and equal dialogue between the people of different cultures and backgrounds”. Therefore, the definition of dialogical multiculturalism explains the ethical norms, principles and institutional structures required for such dialogue to occur. On the basis of such kind explanation, the debate …show more content…
For states level, it helps in decreasing conflicts through the management tool of peaceful coexistence between states for living together and equal in dignity. For individual level, it ensures the individual and collective rights such as studying in one’s own language which limits the discrimination. Multiculturalism is also as a means of social recognition. In other words, it represents the most used common characteristics among the people within the given community through their language, religion, lifestyle, artistic expressions and so on. Indian Philosopher Amartya Sen states about “it is a mix that everyone experiences in his life through meetings, travel or migration, reading, projects, and examinations. All cultures are hybrid, mixed, infused” . This cultural diversity is considered as a meaningful resource for the society which empowers universal values and human rights. However, this cultural diversity has limitations in the cases of immigration of foreign origin individuals and their descendants to access rights, employment and for residents and citizenship purposes as it creates cultural variation and differences among them in their clothing, food habits, and religious
This actually is different from the former two as it represents the practical level rather than the policy areas. This was primarily developed by Parekh (2000) who suggested “multiculturalism explains well how the cultural communities should relate to one another. It also prioritized that only the norms and values of different cultures within a given context cannot bring about peace and solidarity rather by creating an open and equal dialogue between the people of different cultures and backgrounds”. Therefore, the definition of dialogical multiculturalism explains the ethical norms, principles and institutional structures required for such dialogue to occur. On the basis of such kind explanation, the debate …show more content…
For states level, it helps in decreasing conflicts through the management tool of peaceful coexistence between states for living together and equal in dignity. For individual level, it ensures the individual and collective rights such as studying in one’s own language which limits the discrimination. Multiculturalism is also as a means of social recognition. In other words, it represents the most used common characteristics among the people within the given community through their language, religion, lifestyle, artistic expressions and so on. Indian Philosopher Amartya Sen states about “it is a mix that everyone experiences in his life through meetings, travel or migration, reading, projects, and examinations. All cultures are hybrid, mixed, infused” . This cultural diversity is considered as a meaningful resource for the society which empowers universal values and human rights. However, this cultural diversity has limitations in the cases of immigration of foreign origin individuals and their descendants to access rights, employment and for residents and citizenship purposes as it creates cultural variation and differences among them in their clothing, food habits, and religious