Comparison Of Classical-Scientific Management Theories

Register to read the introduction… This style may sound effective fits very few managing situations and is limited in its level of success due to poor worker relations. Workers and low levels of management are the people working for to achieve the business' goals so inturn they would have many different ideas on how to improve productivity, however, limiting their decision making power will result in workers attitudes towards work decreasing which will limit the organisations growth through the business cycle.
The Classical-Scientific management theories moulded what …show more content…
It emphasised that managers should become leaders instead of dictators which built up employee relationships which inturn improved their efforts towards work and production.
The management studies of Elton Mayo concluded that people work better if they know that management is concerned about their welfare. Money is less important than group standards and social needs and workers enjoyed the fact that they were part of a team. In other words Elton Mayo discovered theory of managing based around leading workers, by setting standards looking after their social welfare motivating workers by offering rewards and communicating with workers to increase job satisfaction, which in turn leads to better output.
Mary Parker Follet had views of management, which were also affective due to the fact they were people orientated. She believed that managers should lead rather than command and should be partners with workers to evoke the workers full potential. Abraham Maslow contributed to this theory with his own, which was concerned with motivation of workers. This looked once again to praise, non monetary and monetary