Business Law

Improved Essays
1. Show Me The Money Sports Agency is likely to win a tortious interference with a contract lawsuit against Tortious Competitor Agency for unlawfully hiring Show Me The Money Sports Agency’s employee, Tom Cuban while under contract at Show Me The Money. In order to prevail in a lawsuit alleging tortious interference with a contract, the plaintiff must first prove the existence of a valid, enforceable contract. In this case, Tom Cuban signed a contract agreeing not to compete with Show Me The Money for a minimum of two years following termination of employment at Show Me The Money. The next requirement needed to prove tortious interference with a contractual relationship is proving that the third party, in this case, Tortious Competitor Agency …show more content…
Show Me The Money Sports Agency is somewhat likely to win a tortious interference with a business relationship lawsuit against Tom Cuban for taking predatory measures to steal customers from Show Me the Money by way of negatively portraying Show Me The Money’s employees for Tortious Competitor Agency’s benefit. In order to win this lawsuit alleging this business relationship tortious interference, Show Me The Money will have to prove that Cuban utilized wrongful, predatory methods to drive his former employer out of business; i.e. the opposite of free market competition. First and foremost it is clear that Cuban intervened with the client-business relationship in this case. However, while what Cuban did is clearly unethical and interfered with the client-business relationship Show Me The Money had with said clients, the stories pertained to one employee, Bob Mack rather than Show Me the Money in general. If Show Me The Money can prove that by telling these negative stories about Mack, Cuban is purposefully ruining the reputation of Show Me the Money with the intent to drive them out of business, there is a potential that the case can go in their …show more content…
GatorPower is likely to win a trademark infringement lawsuit against both Tom Cuban and Tortious Competitor Agency for utilizing the brand name in a marketing plan created to secure clients for Tortious Competitor. In order to succeed in such an action GatorPower first has to have a registered trademark or tradename. Subsequently, the plaintiff has to prove that the defendant’s use of the mark created a likely confusion about the origin of the defendant’s goods or services. No actual intention to do so needs to be proven. Because the marketing plan was used to persuade other clients to use Tortious Competitor Agency’s services, by crediting an endorsement security to Tortious Competitor, there is an established reasonable confusion surrounding the origin of the defendant’s

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    This is in response to the breach of contract by Main Line and Kim Basinger in the production of the movie “Boxing Helena.” The defendants and appellants are appealing because they disagree on the sufficiency of the evidence and the excessiveness of the damages. In addition, the defendants state the special verdicts were prejudicially ambiguous because they failed to differentiate between the liability of Mighty Wind and Basinger by using the term…

    • 946 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The case of Stern v. Lucy Webb Hayes (1984) was a class action lawsuit in which M. Stern and the patients of Sibley Memorial Hospital sued the Lucy Webb Hayes National Training School for Deaconesses and Missionaries, five financial institutions, and five members of Sibley Memorial Hospital’s Board of Trustees. Plaintiffs alleged the defendants conspired to monetarily benefit from the financial management of the hospital through use of the financial institutions to which they were affiliated. Plaintiffs also alleged breach of fiduciary duty by trustees. During this case the plaintiffs attempted to establish the conspiracy they had alleged by presenting specific incidences to which questionable financial activity occurred.…

    • 312 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Arcadia Sports Case Study

    • 1678 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Case Study Three: Arcadia Sports In the case of Jeb and Josh in the formation of Arcadia Sports, there are issues concerning the business entity and liability to Jane, who suffered an accident during an excursion with Arcadia Sports. It is unclear what type of business has been formed between Jeb and Josh and what liability each may have for the accident and what personal assets would be involved considering Jeb’s bankruptcy. Therefore, the main types of business entities, including advantages and disadvantages, will be discussed before providing a recommended business entity for Jeb and Josh. Further, an assessment will be made of the type of business that would result in personal liability for Jeb and Josh for Jane’s accident, and how each…

    • 1678 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Tallahassee Bean Counters (TBC) – GOLD Final Audit Fraud Report: 1. Who committed the fraud? 2. How was the fraud committed? 3.…

    • 1242 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The California Cyrobank case is one of the strangest cases I have ever heard. To me, it shows how important the role of sports in society is that some people would be willing to pay the outrageous money so that their kid could be “tall and coordinated”, let’s say. As CEO Gary Weinhouse says, “ Parents don’t want their child to be picked on, they want him or her to make the team and not have to sit on the bench”. 3.…

    • 1218 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The entrepreneur and billionaire Mark Cuban often refers to the fire Jack Ma possessed as “sweat equity”, which he considers to be one of the greatest assets any entrepreneur can…

    • 1281 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Case: Vanna WHITE (Plaintiff) v. SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., a New York corporation, and David Deutsch Associates, Inc., a New York corporation (Defendants) Citation: 971 F.2d 1395 (Case Brief Document) Procedural History (what happened in the case): Samsung Electronics America Inc. and David Deutsch Associates Inc., Defendants, were sued by Vanna White, Plaintiff, because Defendants used a robot likeness of Plaintiff in a series of advertisements without Plaintiff’s consent or monetary compensation. Plaintiff claimed common law rights of publicity and the Lanham Act. The District Court granted summary judgment in favor of Defendants. Plaintiff appealed. Facts: Defendants produced an advertisement campaign around the likeness of a popular TV show, “Wheel of Fortune.”…

    • 718 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Facts: The plaintiff was Gina. M. Holmes and the defendant was Petrovich Development Company. Holmes worked as the the executive assistant for Petrovich, who is the company’s secretary. The reasons for this case is that Holmes claimed to have a hostile work environment that had sexual harassment, there was retaliation wrongful termination in violation of public policy, they violated her right of privacy and they intentionally gave her emotional distress.…

    • 522 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    He knowingly signed and released inaccurate reports during this time period. As a co-founder and CEO of MicroStrategies, Michael Saylor was a controlling shareholder and top executive officer. The SEC stated that he “…signed the periodic reports and participated in the negotiation of several of the largest restated deals (SEC, 2000).”…

    • 2052 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Fact-finding is "a third-party dispute resolution method in which a neutral third party investigates a bargaining impasse and issues nonbinding recommendations for a settlement" (Budd, 2017). Fact-finding is important to labor relations because it allows unbiased settlement terms, management and the union to not appear weak because they are following the suggestions made by the third-party, and lastly publicity might drive the parties to settle the dispute in order to save face with the public (Budd, 2017). The purpose that fact-finding serves is to hear an unbiased party's thoughts and opinions on how to resolve a labor relations dispute. A third-party can offer unbiased opinions and options to help both sides involved decide on a plan…

    • 262 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Great Essays

    The Case Study in question relates to a racial discrimination suit filed by James Jackson III against the National Football League (NFL) in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York in June 1994. Jackson had previously filed a discrimination charge in 1991 with the Equal Opportunity Commission and was granted the right to sue on July 1, 1992 (Jackson v. National Football League, 1994). The plaintiff, James Jackson III, an African American minor league football coach, sued the NFL because he was not granted an interview for a head coaching position in the World League of American Football (WLAF). The WLAF was formed by the owners and teams of the NFL as a corporation and limited partnership whose sole shareholders were the…

    • 1429 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Legal Jurisprudence

    • 2155 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Legal Jurisprudence Legal aspects of ehealth have been raised with concerns about the accuracy and unregulated status of this aspect of health innovation especially in industrial nation and there are ongoing debate, there seem to be a general agreement that there is need for a proper regulatory framework to be put in place and bio-data collected need to be protected with a universally acceptable privacy and data protection policies, this is to prevent the abuses of patients electronic health record and also prosecute cybernetic criminals who try to hack into health system without authorization. This legal aspect needs to be looked into in light of the growing cyber-threat and extremist and terrorist with the possibility of security breach…

    • 2155 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Contract Law Case

    • 1126 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Issue: This IRAC is to determine whether a contract exists between Molly, jack, and Levi in relation to the setup and operation of Sutton 's Surf School. In particularly whether or not Molly is entitled to a share of the business profits. The relevant focus of this case is contract law.…

    • 1126 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Final Outline Brandy Noell BUS 311: Business Law I Instructor Brian Lahargoue September 19, 2016 I. Introduction 1. Acme Fireworks sells kinds of fireworks that include but are not limited to single-use and aerial display ground show. If an individual can think of it, Acme Fireworks can supply it. Acme Fireworks is a sole proprietorship that started out in a smal garageand is now looking to change its entity status. They are looking change because of the recent influx of larger business contract requests that will create a larger employee base, causing more liability risk, and higher demand for what some may deam either dangerous or even a hazzardous product which in turn will prompt evaluation of insurance coverage and…

    • 732 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    2. In the business world, firms tend to have large costs and therefore it would seem that firms are more likely to insure themselves of these perceived risks by signing onto contracts. However, it turns out that non-contractual relations are very common and subsequently, very important in business. In his piece, “Non-Contractual Relations in Business: A Preliminary Study,” Stewart Macaulay discusses why firms tend to engage in non-contractual relations.…

    • 932 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays

Related Topics