Breach Of Negligence Case Study

Improved Essays
Problem 1:

Breach of contract. Inducing a breach of contract can occur when on business’s employee leaves to work for a rival business in the same field (Yates, 121). As Jennifer’s old assistant was poached by a rival company, this could be considered a breach of contract if her assistant had committed to stay with the company for a certain period of time or had agreed not to disclose ‘trade secrets’. In order to sue successfully, Jennifer would have to prove that her assistant was aware of the commitment he’d made in this contract and that the contract was intentionally breached (Yates, 121).
Vicarious Liability. The concept of vicarious liability occurs when one person is responsible for the torts of another, even when they aren’t at fault.
…show more content…
Negligence has four specific requirements which need to be met: a duty to exercise care, a breach of standard care, causation, and damages. As James is the invitee, Jennifer owes him a duty of care when he is in her offices as it was reasonably foreseeable that someone might trip and hurt themselves on the frayed carpet (Yates, 136). Jennifer also would have breached the standard of care by not posting a warning about the possible hazard as a reasonable person would have done (Yates, 140-141). However, the tort of negligence requires there to have been a physical injury. If James fell and fractured his ankle, he would meet all the criteria in order to sue for negligence. However, if he only sustained minor injury, he cannot sue since he did not incur sufficient substantial damage (Yates, 143). This can be proven by examining the case of O.E.X Electromagnetic Inc. v. Coopers & Lybrand (Yates 144).
Assault. Assault occurs when someone is fearful that they will be physically struck (Yates, 100). If someone fears or anticipates physical contact, it is considered assault. These can be in the form of threats or aggressive language directed at someone (Yates,101). James ‘yells abusively at Paul’ when he falls, which depending on what was said, could be considered assault if Paul fear that the altercation would result in unwanted physical contact. However, as Paul simply yelled back and didn’t display any signs of fear, we can assume this is not the
…show more content…
While in the past you were only liable to the people you entered into contract with, however under tort law outsiders can also have a right to punitive damages (Yates, 157).This means that there can be a duty of care owed to someone who isn’t a direct client if they sustained a financial or physical loss because of your negligence. The professional is liable for the advice used by anyone considered to be a ‘foreseeable plaintiff’. For example in the case of Haig v. Bramford, Bramford was deemed liable for Haig’s financial losses even though he wasn’t a direct client of Bramford’s (Yates, 160). As Jennifer knew that Julia Chen was using this information, she owed her a duty of care and is liable for her economic loss. Additionally, the information has to have been used by its intended purpose. For example in the Hercules Management Ltd. v. Ernst & Young case, the information was intended to be used by management and not for investment purposes, meaning that they weren’t liable for the investor’s losses (Yates, 161). However in this case the documents were used for their intended purpose and so negligent mistreatment applies. In order to avoid negligent mistreatment lawsuits, Jennifer could put a disclaimer on her statements warning about their using this information and that it is not intended for anyone who is not a client. By adding this “use at your own risk” statement to her reports, she could argue that anyone who uses the information in the

Related Documents

  • Great Essays

    Negligence Tort Case Study

    • 1285 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Negligence occurs when a particular person fails to perform a duty that they are entitled to perform. According to laws.com, there are four things that must occur in or-der for a tort to be a negligence tort, “a person must owe a duty or service to the victim in question; the individual who owes the duty must violate the promise or obligation; an injury then must arise because of that specific violation; and the injury causes must have been reasonably foreseeable as a result of the person’s negligent actions. (laws.com)” The decision in the case, Tarasoff vs. Regents of University of California, demonstrates these four qualifying factors, therefore making it a negligence tort case.…

    • 1285 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Oliver Vs Brock Case Study

    • 1381 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Whitfield who was accused of contacting Dr. Brock for advice in the treatment for Anita admits that he “described generally the injuries of Plaintiff and the type of treatment Affiant was then giving the Plaintiff, in which Dr. Brock did indicate he thought the treatment to be correct.” It is important to note that Dr. Whitfield never stated the Plaintiff’s name, making him unaware of the patient who received the treatment. In support of Dr. Brock, Whitfield stated that Brock was never employed by him or the Plaintiff to provide care or treatment to the Plaintiff’s injuries. The exchange between Brock and Whitfield was asserted by the court that “mere discussion between professional people of hypothetical situations cannot be viewed as a basis for liability.”…

    • 1381 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Tort Law Case Study

    • 502 Words
    • 3 Pages

    From Sweethearts to Sour Tarts, Millionaire Matchmaker Sued The dating scene has changed dramatically over the course of a few years. With more people having access to the internet, online dating is no longer something the desperate or insecure; everybody is dating online. As more people date online, the need to weed out the bad apples from those people who are truly looking for love becomes obvious. When it comes to people who have money, they pay elite matchmakers to weed out the individuals who may not be compatible with them.…

    • 502 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Great Essays

    I. Introduction To examine the relevant facts and legal authorities with the aim of representing Greene's Jewelry Wholesale in a suit brought by them against Jennifer Lawson and Howell Jewelry World. Issues Was Jennifer Lawson employment terminated lawfully at Greene’s Jewelry Wholesale?…

    • 1560 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    General Assault Assault includes any physical attack, whether it is on purpose or not, that results in injury to another person. This also includes assault that has not yet happened, but is planned to happen. Threats of assault may be physical, verbal, or written. They may be said or sent by: • Mail. • Email.…

    • 332 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Ron V. Fieryl

    • 416 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Although this may be incriminating evidence against Ron, it may also be so for Cheryl because she obtained the document illegally. In this situation, I would not negotiate with Ron's lawyer, however, I would turn the documents over to the proper authorities. Some states allow a lawyer to take possession of evidentiary material to examine but require the lawyer to turn that evidence over to the proper authority, such as the police and may require additional steps, such as returning the document to its rightful owner.(comment 3.4(a)). Rule 4.4 does not explicitly address the legal duties of a lawyer when the lawyer receives documents that they know or reasonably should know have been inappropriately obtained by the sending person. Cheryl is the "sending person" in this case.…

    • 416 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Illinois has a modified comparative negligence structure in that the plaintiff’s claim is barred if the jury finds that the plaintiff’s comparative negligence is more than fifty percent. Instruction B45.01 of the Illinois Pattern Jury Instructions informs the jury of this rule of law and this has been shown to discourage juries from finding plaintiffs more than fifty percent at fault for their injuries. If the jury determines that plaintiff’s comparative negligence to be fifty percent or less, then the amount of the verdict is reduced by the same percentage as the plaintiff’s comparative negligence. Based upon the investigation that we have been able to complete to date, we believe that a jury will allocate the majority of liability against…

    • 1263 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Issue: Did Abner commit assault and battery1? Rule: Assault is a physical act of a threating nature or an offer of corporal injury which puts an individual in reasonable fear of imminent bodily harm. Battery is the intentional infliction of harm or offensive contact. Analysis: Did Abner commit assault?…

    • 262 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Video Response: Lawsuit- School Negligence Rose-Gaelle Labranche St. Thomas University Video Response: Lawsuit- School Negligence The situation that occurred in Hope Academy Charter School in Grand Rapids may leave the school liable regarding the rape of the 14-year-old student. This student suffers from emotional, mental and behavioral disorders; that is typically why she was enrolled in this school, as school personnel are trained to deal with such disorders. Although the student was acting up resulting to a suspension for the day, she should not have been released from the school campus without parental escort as stated in her records.…

    • 490 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    McClanahan likely has an attorney negligence claim against Barrington because he did not base his advice on adequate knowledge or reasonable legal research. Attorneys are liable to their clients for negligent performance of their duties. Smith 356 Davis 886 Aloy 416. Attorneys should perform their duties with the “skill, prudence and diligence” of a lawyer of ordinary skill. Smith 356.…

    • 868 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Jones will not be regarded as willful or wanton disregard of Vega's safety for failing to disclose Nelly tendency of flicking hats off because he did not have actual knowledge of potential danger. The Texas exceptions to the limitation on liability for farm animal activities provide one exception of willful or wanton disregard for participant's safety which may invoke the liability. §87.004(4). Willful and wanton disregard means, "the entire want of care" which raises the belief that the "act or omission complained," was the result of "conscious indifference" to the "welfare of the person" who affected by it.…

    • 871 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A young child’s infringement of a statute proposed to control the circumstance which delivered damage is in many states held not to constitute negligence in essence or even, in a considerable lot of those which perceive a decisive assumption of inadequacy for negligence in exceptionally youthful kids, allowable proof of carelessness. Where an infringement is allowed to be considered as a major aspect of the confirmation bearing on the subject of contributory negligence, the youngster's obligation to comply with the statute is much of the time held not to be outright, but rather just to constitute such consistence as would commonly be anticipated from children of a similar age, knowledge and involvement in similar conditions. In England, Wales and Northern Ireland, the law expresses that the time of criminal obligation is 10 years. That acquaints a lawful civil argument as with regardless of whether a youngster would ever be liable of…

    • 624 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Negligence Analysis (CDW)

    • 770 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Negligence Analysis (against CDW) Duty They did not act with reasonable care like the ordinary, reasonable, and prudent person because the store did not have a warning sign regarding possible injury due to poor stocking while other stores do have warning signs. In the surveillance, it showed that an employee was walking in the same aisle before the accident happened and did look up at the shelves but continued walking because a customer needed help. Breach…

    • 770 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Negligence Case Study

    • 745 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Question 1 Area of the Tort law: Negligence Liability Material Facts: Benji v Parramatta Storms Rugby League Club, Jack and Bronco (Personal Injury- Head)/ Negligence act. Benji (Plaintiff), a first grade league player of Western Tigers Rugby League Football Club was severely injured following a spear tackle by Parramatta Storms Rugby League Club’s (first defendant) players Jack and Bronco (second and third defendants). Benji was therefore forced into career retirement at his peak due to negligent acts of the defendant. Subsequently, National Rugby League charged the second and third defendant with having made a dangerous throw, to which they pleaded guilty. Issues: The most pertinent issue at hand is the fact that whether the defendants…

    • 745 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Now, regarding breach of fiduciary duty and duty of loyalty, Jane was entrusted to oversee and help manage your financial assets. As your agent/employee, she has a duty to act in your best interest, notify you of vital information, maintain accurate data, and perform the duties as agreed upon hiring and job description. Jane failed to uphold her agent/employee duties and that is why I feel we would be able to also use this as our legal defense (Hancock Estabrook, LLP, 2017); (Herron, et al., 2011). I know we will win this legal defense, since we will be able to prove that Jane actions has impacted the company’s assets substantially, to the point that you may have to file…

    • 120 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays

Related Topics