Bus 430 Entire Course ( International Business Law ) Complete Course

944 Words Dec 30th, 2015 4 Pages
BUS 430 Entire Course ( International Business Law ) Complete Course
Follow Link Below To Get Tutorial https://homeworklance.com/downloads/bus-430-entire-course-international-business-law-complete-course/ Description: BUS 430 Week 1 DQ 1 What are some differences when doing business internationally opposed to domestically? How do international business risks differ from domestic business risk? What factors influence these risks? BUS 430 Week 1 DQ2 Why do corporations need to be concerned with human rights issues when conducting business internationally? Who are corporations accountable to – the government of their home country, the host country, investors, or the public? What is the rationale for your answer? BUS
…show more content…
Ressorp, Inc. and Reardon expressly agreed that Reardon would not pay for the television sets until Reardon both received and sold the merchandise in the United States. They also agreed that the merchandise would be shipped CPT Portstown in the United States and that Incoterms 2010 would govern. Ressorp, Inc. arranged to ship the goods with Oceanic Carriers, whose place of business is located in Beachtown, Japan. Ressorp, Inc. loaded the goods from its warehouse into a trailer and delivered the trailer to Oceanic’s freight depot in Beachtown. Several days later, the trailer was discovered to be missing and then it was found abandoned and empty. Reardon, the buyer, then sued Oceanic Carriers. The carrier challenged Reardon’s standing (right) to sue claiming that the original contract said Reardon had no liability to pay for the merchandise until after it was received and sold by Reardon. Therefore, Oceanic Carriers argued, it was the seller, Ressorp, Inc. who should have brought the suit, not Reardon. Is Oceanic correct? Explain why or why not. BUS 430 Week 3 DQ3 The Jolly Canning Co. in Hawaii agreed to sell 10,000 cases of canned green beans to the Merry Produce Co. in New York. The terms were FOB Bigport in Hawaii. The parties agreed that the governing rules were Incoterms 2010. Jolly, by mistake, delivered 10,000 cases of canned corn to the carrier in Bigport. Moreover, the bill of lading clearly stated that goods were canned corn. While the

Related Documents