Hobby Hobby Lobby Pros And Cons

Great Essays
In the United States constitution, people are given protection and rights that allow their religious beliefs to exempt themselves from laws and regulations. Religious freedom is very important in America because of the protected rights to all people. The religious freedom restoration act that was put into place in 1993 by the Federal government as well as the state of Indiana to protect people as well as corporation’s religious beliefs and background. There are many instances for cases dealing with religious differences at the state and federal level. The Religious Freedom Restoration Act of 1993 states that the act prohibits any agency, department, or official of the United States or any State (the government) from substantially burdening …show more content…
Under the Dictionary Act, “the word ‘person’ include[s] corporations, companies, associations, societies, as well as individuals.” (Burwell v. Hobby Lobby) Hobby Lobby believed that they should be exempt from providing their female employees with certain types of contraception that will operate after the fertilization of the egg which is an early stage of abortion. The four contraceptive methods at issue are abortifacients. The corporation is not looking to prevent coverage of all birth control pills but certain ones that are effective after the egg has been fertilized, which is seen as a human with a right to live in the Christianity community. The Hobby Lobby family holds the Christian values and morals very close and the company mission of “In accordance with their religious beliefs and moral principles operate in a professional environment founded upon the highest ethical, moral, and Christian principles.” The Department of Health and Human Services regulations burden the exercise of religion for the Hobby Lobby Stores. Since the HHS regulation and argument is unlawful that the companies forfeited all RFRA protection when they decided to structure it as a corporation instead of a partnership between the founders. While creating this law, Congress wanted to make sure that it would not be suppressing businesses and corporations that work with religious belief …show more content…
I think that from a broad sense this does not seem logical but they are involved with the community as have a voice. In the case of Burwell v. Hobby Lobby Stores the owners have a say in what their company resembles and what their values are by not wanting to provide contraception that is a drug that kills the fertilized egg. With Christian values held close it can be similar to the idea of a parent (owners) not wanting to pay for their daughter’s (employee) birth control. Many corporations advertise the values they believe in and it is the job of the consumer to find out where they wish to spend their money and support. They clearly know that being closed on Sundays hurts their revenue and millions lost in revenue each year but continue to remain closed because Christians believe Sunday is the sabbath day. Several other large corporations include themselves on resting on the sabbath such as Chick-fil-A. One aspect says that if the employees want the coverage that bad they can look for work elsewhere but that employee should also have equal rights and access if they wish because other corporations are forced to offer it as

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    If a family has a right to their opinion, and that family decides to start a business, then the business becomes an extension of the family and their beliefs. Not only does a person have a right their property in the business, but they also have a right to their opinions and beliefs expressed by the company which are,in turn, expressions of the owner of the business. If a government agency were to try to make a family owned company provide full medical coverage to its employees that covered operations like abortion and other means of contraceptives, then the government would essentially be imposing beliefs on it citizens, thus creating a religious burden on the company 's owners. This could be seen as the government also trying to establish religious beliefs, which is against the Establishment Clause found in the First Amendment of the United States…

    • 1070 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Hobby Lobby Supreme Court case was definitely one case that significantly impacted business and society. The owners of the Hobby Lobby corporation went to trial in order to prevent from providing free contraceptive to their employees because it was against their beliefs. In fact, they won the trial and were given the right to religious freedom. Hobby Lobby, and other corporations should not have the right to religious freedom. Corporations should not have the right to religious freedom because employers should not push their beliefs and make decisions for their employees, nor be exempt from following certain government regulations that would benefit their employees.…

    • 814 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Burwell v, Hobby Lobby is a court case that resulted from an issue which addresses the necessity of closely held corporations supplying birth control to its employees. The argument of this case is regarding the mandatory requirement to supply coverage for birth control. Hobby Lobby feels the mandate will also cover birth control options that also includes the abortion pill. Hobby Lobby opposed to this idea and due to their religious beliefs. they believe that they should not be required to supply such coverage for birth control under the Religious Freedom Restoration Act and the Free Exercise Clause.…

    • 735 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    the expectant mother has right to a consensual abortion is conditional upon parental rights and they may forbid the abortion, is it fair and equal for society to take responsibility of the child if mother decides that she cannot take care of it? On the other hand, her family physician also as a doctor's should support the benefits of the expectant mother and community. In fact prevention harm of pregnant female by not burdening the society with their children . when they can't provide that for them. However , what about the parents opinion for this issue in our conservative culture .…

    • 1427 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The main one being view is the freedom of religion. Hobby Lobbies founders believe that it is their rights to deny workers insurance to get contraceptives for they believe it goes against their religious morals and if they went against them they would be denying the first amendment. The Burwell’s side pertains more towards the workers and what they should be provided by the company and whether birth control should be provided. Both are arguments in which it is testing what should a person should be given. One is relating to religion and the other is questioning if this is not right to deny (mainly) women this right to control their own body.…

    • 1461 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Pro-life advocates has exceptions, for example; the fetus could be aborted only if it is conceived less than 90 days, during this time the fetus is not moving within the woman’s womb, neither their heart is beating or it have not developed living organs, therefore, they are not considered a person or living organism yet. This decision is explained by religious believers, who according to their beliefs God endowed a soul to a person giving them rights, which includes the right to live. If someone breaks this rule and decides to have an abortion after this timeframe then, they would be committing an immoral action. In the case of congenital defects, the pro-life activist argues that an indicator of a disease or deformity does not indicate that the child would be born into a life of suffering. They believe anyone can live a satisfying life with deformities and disease through guidance and love.…

    • 837 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Mary Leigh Cheng Dr. Bruce M. Wilson POS2041 American National Government 26 September 2016 706 words Same-Sex Marriage v. Religious Freedom The ongoing controversy between religious rights and the legalization of same-sex marriage exemplifies the complexities between civil rights and civil liberties. Those who support marriage equality back most of their claims with the Fourteenth Amendment, which emphasizes the equal treatment of all people under the law (Legal Information Institute). Those advocating religious freedom back their claims with the First Amendment, which ensures that the government does not interfere with the free exercise of religion, or create an official religion (Sidlow and Henschen 77). Compromise is necessary to uphold…

    • 959 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The government has a huge say on whether designer babies will be allowed, but I think it’s more up to the public to decide. Why wouldn’t the public want to have the choice on what their baby looks like, if the baby can be used as a donor for a sick of ill child? For the people that cannot have children due to disease from birth. The government has to think of all these factors before putting it into play and allowing the designer babies to be real. The debate from the public is normally more for the NO side of things, saying that it’s unhuman or against nature or its going to become cloning.…

    • 1424 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Freedom Of Religion

    • 1020 Words
    • 5 Pages

    To settle down the wave of disapproval, the government restrains from showing favor over one’s religion. A professor of Law at Emory University, John Witte Jr. claims, “ In response, a good number of states reformed their constitutions — at minimum outlawing direct state aid for religious/ education and other religious causes, sometimes taking more-aggressive steps of restricting religious tax exemptions and corporate charters.” ( First Amendment Center). Freedom of religion generates the government to treat all religions with fairness. In addition, it protects all individuals from the injustice rules of the government toward one…

    • 1020 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Green family has stake in the outcome because it is basically them that have to pay out the tax penalty for not providing the contraceptives to their employees and going against their religion. The employees also have a stake in this ruling because it is them that are trying to force their employer to provide the contraceptive as a part of their health care plan with the company. You could also say that this is a landmark case because they are setting the precedent for employees and companies to come. Whatever happens in this case could have ramification to other Christian-based companies that are trying to impose their religious ideologies on their for-profit…

    • 840 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays