My thoughts on burning books is you should not do it, there is no point in it at all the book has not hurt or harmed you in any way shape or form if you think the book is a bad book do
Not read the book. The book may have some wording you do not agree with but that does
Not give you the right that an author has taken his time and hard work to go out and burn the book. If you think the book is that bad then don't even look at it. “The nazi’s did not burn books”(paragraph 1 of Heinrich Heine on Burning Books) they are one of the worst groups
In the world and they did not even burn books. The books if you look at the book from two perspectives the book may look very bad and say some bad stuff but really the book may be an eye opener to you and probably everyone. The whole …show more content…
The books in flames they say are entertaining to the people because they think it is really going to change something about the way it is written and and the way it is worded. The people have minds that they all different and the people that are burning the books it really shows their intelligence of the people. Those books could really open their eyes in a new and better world but they wouldn’t know because their burning it before even considering it.
The final thoughts on the burning of the book is no writer should have to see their book being burned because it is not fair to the writer of the book at all. The hard word and many thoughts they put into that book were countless and to see people taking a match to them would kill me if it was me as the writer of the book. The book have really not threatened them at all the people threaten them selves. But overall the burning of books should be against the law because it is not fair to the writer cause it so called threatens the reader and is really no point in it at
Not read the book. The book may have some wording you do not agree with but that does
Not give you the right that an author has taken his time and hard work to go out and burn the book. If you think the book is that bad then don't even look at it. “The nazi’s did not burn books”(paragraph 1 of Heinrich Heine on Burning Books) they are one of the worst groups
In the world and they did not even burn books. The books if you look at the book from two perspectives the book may look very bad and say some bad stuff but really the book may be an eye opener to you and probably everyone. The whole …show more content…
The books in flames they say are entertaining to the people because they think it is really going to change something about the way it is written and and the way it is worded. The people have minds that they all different and the people that are burning the books it really shows their intelligence of the people. Those books could really open their eyes in a new and better world but they wouldn’t know because their burning it before even considering it.
The final thoughts on the burning of the book is no writer should have to see their book being burned because it is not fair to the writer of the book at all. The hard word and many thoughts they put into that book were countless and to see people taking a match to them would kill me if it was me as the writer of the book. The book have really not threatened them at all the people threaten them selves. But overall the burning of books should be against the law because it is not fair to the writer cause it so called threatens the reader and is really no point in it at