Clegg,Kornberger & Pitsis (2011, p.168) defines human resource management as a process of recruitment, selection, retention and development of labour. The Bureaucratic era was primarily evident during the rise of industrialisation and saw human resource management focusing on matching the labourer’s skills to the designated tasks. Its authoritarian roots scrutinized its workers as distrusted, lazy, irresponsible and self-interested where tightening …show more content…
As a consequence of the ineffectiveness of regulations that encourages foreigners to vocation in Australia, their inability to attain professional accreditation, lack acknowledgement of their proficiencies in the field and biasness wedges these foreigners from gaining their full potential that they are obliged to undertake lower skilled paid employment opportunities. Many individuals debates that foreign workers lack the language proficiency and inability to adapt to the Australian work culture. Engendering them to become less employable. Furthermore, the resources required to sustain an overseas based experienced worker concerning with time and training can at times be an exorbitant expense for many small businesses such that more larger firms who are more diverse and have a larger surplus of funds available for disposable. In addition, managerial arrogance and their inertia for a change of the bureaucratic work culture as previously it was embedded in their mentality that the Australian workforce was to predominantly a white-male monoculture. As a consequence, this may have skewed the chances of employment for foreigners wanting to participate within the labour workforce. Overall, a change in Australia’s policy and establishing an enthusiastic mentality towards foreign workers participating within the Australian …show more content…
Such that in today’s era, there is a mutual understanding that women were equal to men in western society as they are able to receive the same education as men and that they were no longer different because there were not longer imposed restrictions between the two genders. However despite society valuing women as equals to men, data from the Australian Bureau of Statistics proved to be a facade. It elicited that the disparity between the two genders based on full-time average weekly total earning was approximately $298.10 and nationally the gender pay gap was 18.8% (2014). Having the gender gap higher than previous years by 1.7%, this reveals the facade in which society has for the acknowledgement of the equality between man and woman as society being a whole values the equality however statistically pictured by the Australian Bureau report indicates that the inequality the national gender pay gap is ascending and that greater depth of study into understanding the roots of this underlining issue will assist greatly in significantly shrinking inequality between the genders. Overall, the disparity in pay and the gradual growth of women present in the workforce, which may dampen and jeopardise the long-term objectives of establishing a fair and equal working environment for the two