Burden Of Proof Essay

The burden of proof when it comes to the criminal justice system is different for both civil and criminal cases. For a civil case the burden of proof is the preponderance of the evidence, while in a criminal case the burden of proof is beyond a reasonable doubt. It is fair to say that the civil law’s level of intentionality and burdens is easier to prove than the criminal case. With a criminal case, the prosecutors must meet to get a conviction. In a criminal case the defendant is innocent until proven guilty. It’s the prosecutor job to prove to the court that the defendant is guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. The jury will decide in a civil case if the defendant is guilty or not. If the evidence provided is not enough to prove the defendant guilty, the case will be dismiss. The jury must decide if there is enough evidence to equal 99 percent, and therefore the prosecution met its burden of proof …show more content…
The evidence provided in a civil case must convince the judge and jury that the defendant is guilty. The evidence must meet the burden of prove. Even if the plaintiff have enough evidence to win the case, the final decision is based on the court opinion of the evidence provided. During a civil trial, both side are equal 50/50. At the end of the trial one side must convince the court 51/49 depending on the facts presented to win the case (Calisi, 2017).
There are many civil cases that are commonly witnessed in the industry which involve public law enforcement agencies official. Police officers are sworn in to protect the public from both foreign and domestic threats. When it come to them performing their duties they sometimes make the wrong judgment call that cause harm to others. If this incident occurs that due to a law enforcement officials actins lead to someone getting injured, they be civilly or criminally liable for their actions (Police Misconduct and Civil Rights,