Burden Of Proof Case Study

Improved Essays
Burden of Proof: Beyond A Reasonable Doubt
If one is studying law, one should be familiar with the burden of proof and how it may be confusing to understand what beyond reasonable doubt is in criminal cases. If not, burden of proof is where the duty is placed upon a party to prove or disprove a disputed fact, or simply which party bears this burden. In a criminal case, the burden of proof is placed on the prosecution to prove its case beyond a reasonable doubt, which means the evidence presented must be complete and conclusive that there are no reasonable doubts concerning the guilt of the accused. Although, courts tend not to place a numerical value on beyond a reasonable doubt; society thinks that it has to be at least 99% confident that the defendant committed the crime. On the other hand, in civil cases the plaintiff is required to meet the preponderance of the evidence, which means the
…show more content…
With that said, courts should at least explain and break down elements to jury’s simply because this could fixed a problem within/ criminal trials. Solan article also mentions that Norbert Kerr and his colleagues did a study on the burden of proof dealing with a rape trail and the jury ended up receiving a lax meaning of what was to be considered reasonable doubt was for the trail. Result from this study indicate that juries convict less often when asked to focus on how well the government actually proved its case instead of how well the defense has established doubt.
In conclusion, some courts still have not found an actual definition to what “beyond a reasonable doubt” is. With that said, courts continue to seek definitions that are reasonable ones. That way, juries could at least prevent as many convictions as possible. However, it is possible if there is clear and convincing

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    The Insanity Defense

    • 1935 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Although the Insanity defense is questioned and has negative views, it is a very helpful defense for those who are sane, but commited a crime.The insanity defense helps preserve life and gives second chances. Citizens need to understand that there are many laws in place to help this denfense only to be used when necessary. The insanity defense is a plea that helps figure out the real criminal versus humans who need help and rehabilitation. Delusion is irrelevant and so is any form of intoxication and most citizens do not realize that. Statistics have proven the use and effectiveness of this…

    • 1935 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Burden Of Proof Analysis

    • 1249 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Burden of proof can be define as the duty placed upon a party to prove or disprove a disputed fact, or it can define which party bears this burden. In criminal cases, the burden of proof is placed on the prosecution, who must demonstrate that the defendant is guilty before a jury may convict him or her. (TheFreeDictionary.com, 2015) The burden of proof in deciding a case is beyond reasonable doubt in criminal law. However in civil law, the burden of proof in deciding a case is on the balance of probabilities. Lastly, criminal and civil law can be differentiated through the title of the cases.…

    • 1249 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Petitioner also challenged the logic of the government’s argument that the jury instruction constituted plain error. For Petitioner, if the error was so egregious, the government should have objected at trial. Indeed, in other contexts, appellate courts applied the plain error doctrine to legal questions that were contested at the underlying trial, not in situations where there was no objection, and therefore no dispute, between the parties. In support of this argument, Petitioner analogized to the Court’s precedent in the Double Jeopardy context. Petitioner noted that the “the plainness and even egregiousness of an error in adding an extra-statutory element is of no moment for purposes of the Double Jeopardy Clause where an acquittal was…

    • 1083 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The textbook defines the harmless error doctrine as an incident where “an appellate court can affirm one’s conviction despite the presence of of serious prosecutorial misconduct during the trial” (p. 52). This doctrine exemplifies how prosecutors can practically feel inclined to engage in misconduct seeing that it is very difficult for the court system to punish them for such behavior. Furthermore, this doctrine may also apply to serious cases such as death penalty trials, demonstrating the potential for prosecutor misconduct to negatively effect the outcome of any case, large or small. The author of the chapter provides his suggestion considering the current method in which the criminal justice system deals with motions of trial misconduct. He suggests, “motions for retrial based on false testimony presented by prosecution witnesses should be governed by a standard drawn from newly discovered evidence and prosecutorial misconduct” (p. 52).…

    • 652 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    There is also evidence supporting that there may be more innocent people who have admitted guilt in jail due to lack of DNA evidence. The lack of DNA evidence can help the prosecutors case in the event where an individual who admitted to the crime they have not committed wants to appeal his deal. By admitting to the crime, the court believes that this person has admitted to their wrong doing with no evidence to support the defenses appeal, most jury’s would say no innocent man would admit to something they did not…

    • 751 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    However ambiguity arises in the argument that there is or that there should be a third standard. Another important complication to this area of the law arises when considering civil circumstances that may result in criminal sanctions. This is something that will also be considered in detail throughout this essay, and would cause me to argue that the law in this area is not clear and straightforward. In criminal cases the crown must prove the accused committed offence beyond reasonable doubt. In some cases there is a persuasive burden on accused, this discharged by proof on the balance of probabilities.…

    • 1066 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Also, there must be a legal basis for the appeal such as alleged material error in the trial, despite not because the losing party did not agree with the verdict. If the defendant was convicted through the plea bargain then the right of appealing is demolished. Any convicted offenders are able to appeal their case based on the matter of law. When there is an appeal, the court reviews the case looking at the previous proceedings in the lower courts and will not consider new evidence. The appellate courts look at the record and the written briefs filed by the defendant and the prosecutor of the appeal.…

    • 1283 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    They need to be loyal to the rule of law because of procedural fairness. It is difficult to treat same kind of cases the same way and different cases differently because there are other factors that play into each crime, but the court should be consistent with prior decisions. Judges do not have full discretion because they have guidelines they need to rule by. Judges cannot go below or above sentencing guidelines. The way the use their discretion is by the mitigating and aggravating factors that prosecutors and defense attorneys present.…

    • 2082 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    Importance Of Mens Rea

    • 1841 Words
    • 8 Pages

    not of sound mind. The actions of a person, who is not in control of his mind, are not guided by the rational thinking of his brain. He lacks the basic essence of rationality in human beings, such that fundamental maxim of criminal law, i.e, actus non facit reum nisi mens sit rea meaning an act does not constitute guilt unless done with a guilty intention, comes to his help. Mens Rea is an essential element in every crime. There may be no crime of any nature without an evil mind.…

    • 1841 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    It reiterates on there key factors of an Expert Witness which is Retain, Record and Reveal. Moreover criminal proceeding rules emphasize on the criminal proceeding rules adding to it and emphasizing the obligation of the Expert Witness and his duty to the court binds him thus overriding all other obligation especially if he had accepted any bribery or other instruction, which are detrimental to the case itself.…

    • 812 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays