According to Bryceland v. Northey 160 Ariz. 213, 772 P.2d 36 (1989). , the court decided the covenant was unreasonable in restricting Northey and Malvin’s future employment. The court deemed the language of the covenant to be too broad to enforce. The court determined an employer legitimacy protectable interest will be enforced. On the contrary, an employer may not enforce a post-employment restriction on a former employee simply to eliminate competition. Moreover, they decided the time period was unreasonable; in the covenant it restricted the deejays from gaining employment within a two year period. However, there remained insufficient evidence that it will take two years to find a replacement. Conversely, it stood the acceptable time to
