These laws stated that American banks could not give out loans to the belligerents, and that even though America can sell war material to any belligerent, they could not ship it, rather the belligerent has to transport it themselves. On the surface, these laws seemed to safeguard American neutrality. In reality, the British and French were generally favored, because they had larger merchant navies than Germany. Since Britain owned Canada, they were able to buy and transport goods fairly easily. Historian Thomas Fleming wrote in his book The Illusion of Victory: America in World War I: “As the war continued, Wilson edged Bryan to the diplomatic sidelines. He sent his confidential adviser, Col. House, to London, Paris and Berlin to explore the possibilities of a mediated peace. House was ... pro-British ... but concealed it out of his desire to blend with Wilson's seemingly neutral stance. In the State Department, (Under-Secretary of State Robert) Lansing gradually acquired more influence than …show more content…
If they were to warn the ships that they were about to sink them, then they would just radio in for help. Instead Germany proclaimed the waters around Britain to be an unrestricted U-boat zone, and any ships that would enter that zone, they will torpedo. Thus, Germany took out newspaper notices in neutral countries like America, to warn them not to enter this zone. In the beginning a few American ships were attacked, including the wheat transport William P. Frye and the tanker the Gulflight. While Wilson wanted to hold Germany accountably for their actions, Bryan argued that American ships were aware of the risks they were taking by entering a war zone, so they must take responsibility for their actions. Although Bryan did agree with Wilson that Americans have the right to sail anywhere on the high seas, he also believed that there existed “a moral duty which they owe to their government to keep out of danger ... and thereby relieve their government from responsibility for their