Brutus Vs Antony Essay

Improved Essays
When looking at both Brutus's and Antony's speech, it is clear to see that Antony's speech is superior to Brutus's. Antony deals with a crowd Brutus had just turned adjacent to Julius Caesar, making Antony have to word everything he says extremely carefully.As Brutus's speech was shorter and more complex than Antony's, Antony still won the people over in the end.

Brutus uses ethos within the first four lines. He states: "Believe me for mine honor, and have respect to mine honor that you may believe.(III,II,14-15)" This statement is very repetitive. Repetitive statements draw importance to the statement, it makes the citizens listen. This also makes the citizens remember. Antony states "The noble Brutus hath told you Caesar was ambitious. (III,II,75-76)" He is going to relate to the citizens about that they were already told. Calling Brutus a nobleman, which the citizens agrees that Brutus is indeed an honorable and nobleman. The citizens loves Brutus because they believe that he was just saved them from the plague that was Julius Caesar.

Both parties use
…show more content…
And both use that in their favor. Brutus and Antony are constantly stating facts in both of their speeches. "The question of his death is enrolled in the Capitol. His glory not extenuated wherein he was worthy, nor his offenses enforced for which he suffered death. (III,II,35-38)" Brutus is explaining the reasoning behind Caesar's death. Antony uses an extremely powerful statement in his speech: "The evil that men do lives after them, the good if oft interred with their bones. So let it be with Caesar (III,II73-75)" Antony is saying that they are all focusing on the dreadful qualities of Caesar, his ambition, but they are not remembering all the marvelous things that Caesar also did. Antony also shows the people all of Caesar's stab wounds, which obviously win the people over because he is displaying the atrocious behavior Caesar had

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    In my opinion, Antony speech was more delivered better because includes several persuasive details in his speech. After saying that his intent wasn't to praise Caesar, he says, "He was my friend, faithful and just to me. " Antony's speech points out many of Caesar acts that had benefited them as Roman citizens. He plays with their minds saying that Caesar had been generous to them and protected them from the "intruders". He uses rhetorical questions, irony, and etc. to effectively persuade his audience to join his side instead of Brutus'.…

    • 114 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Antony’s speech ultimately leads to a battle between him and the conspirators. Brutus has good intentions, but nevertheless he makes a lot of bad decisions which eventually leads to his…

    • 877 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    In his speech, Marc Antony argues that Brutus' statement that Caesar was ambitious is wrong, while Brutus argues that Caesar was ambitious and power-hungry. Marc Antony appeals to the pulpit by using a past occurrence to give them a reason and an example as to why they should believe him. "When that the poor have cried, Caesar hath wept:/ Ambition should be made of sterner stuff:" (19-20 IIIii). Marc Antony uses this point to get the crowd to understand that Caesar was too emotional and had too big a heart to be considered ambitious. Caesar loved Rome and the people living there so much, that he would have never tried to put any of them in harm's way for the sake of gaining power.…

    • 704 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Pathos In Julius Caesar

    • 703 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The historical play, “Julius Caesar”, by William Shakespeare illustrates the problems of leadership that commence after the assassination of the Roman dictator, Julius Caesar. The play has a thorough use of rhetorical devices and was a powerful persuasion tool during the whole of the show. This literary device is extensively used during the funeral scene in Act three, Scene two where Marcus Brutus and Mark Antony give their speeches about Caesar's death. In their funeral speeches, while Marcus Brutus delivered a logical speech, Mark Antony overall wins the crowd through his use of ethics and empathy. Antony’s speech left such a lasting impact due his skillful use of Pathos.…

    • 703 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Each included example of logos, ethos, and pathos in his speech. However, one crucial mistake that Brutus made when speaking is letting Antony speak after him. He cannot counter what Antony says, and does not know what he tells the people. Because of the way Antony spoke and what he included in his speech, he is able to come out on top. The people are able to relate to the emotion that is pouring out of Antony, whereas they merely listened to the facts that Brutus spoke to them.…

    • 725 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Both speeches of Brutus and Antony about Caesar’s death were compelling, but Mark Antony’s speech was overall superior to that of Brutus’s, for he won back the Roman people’s loyalty. In Brutus’s speech, he tries to invoke the people of Rome using ethos. Brutus uses ethos to credit himself, saying that the people should trust his words. The people of Rome can trust in his words because he is a part of the government, so in using ethos was an effective way on persuading the people.…

    • 534 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    This battle of words takes place during Caesar’s funeral, where both Anthony and Brutus speak in a bid to win over the large crowds of plebeians. There is a major difference between the two character’s and how they address the crowds. Brutus speaks first and reasoning with the crowd using logic; Brutus uses superlatives to argue his case more persuasively: “Not that I loved Caesar less, but that I loved Rome more.” (3.2.20) Through juxtaposing Caesar and Rome, Brutus hopes to simplify his argument against Caesar in order for the plebeians to understand more clearly. This is reinstated by the fact that Shakespeare had Brutus speak in prose which was the style of speech used by the common man.…

    • 2437 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Antony uses several rhetorical devices when trying to persuade the people of Rome, such as anaphora, logos, pathos, and rhetorical questions. The crowd is impressed when Antony shows them that he has “a parchment with the seal of Caesar”(III.ii.130.). The mob becomes depressed when they hear Caesars will. Antony knew that by showing the will, the people the mob would see him as a hero for reading it as they grieve his death. After reading the two speeches, do you agree with Antony’s statement, “I am no orator as Brutus is,/But (as you know me all) a plain blunt man”?…

    • 984 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This grows his credibility in the eyes of the people and the people begin to put their faith in him and his point of view. Antony also says in his speech, “I come to bury Caesar, not to praise him.” Through this simple statement he is proving to the simple people in the audience that his character is not one that would mess with their minds, or try to convince them of something they don’t already believe him. Now whether these statements are his true character or not is irrelevant. The audience believes his intentions and choses to follow his ideas rather than the ideas of Brutus, making him the more effective speaker in this…

    • 1020 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    After saying this he had won the people. Antony proclaims,” when that the poor have cried, Ceasor hath wept.” And “ I thrice presented a kingly crown. This is not the end Antony’s words tower over Brutus’s and the people agree with Antony.…

    • 453 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Act III, Antony stands in front of the group of Plebeians after they have just listened to Brutus, the conspirator’s, reasonings as to why Caesar deserved his death. Mark Antony uses compelling rhetoric, to switch their mindsets, so the commoners pledge to his words instead of Brutus’s. Some may believe Brutus’s leadership skills make him a great speaker, but Mark Antony’s powerful, raw words…

    • 1013 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In William Shakespeare’s play “Julius Caesar” Mark Antony unleashes a powerful speech during Caesar’s funeral, aiming to persuade the people of Rome that Brutus was fallacious to kill Caesar and that they should avenge his death. In Antony’s oration, he argues his case against Brutus by using the rhetorical strategies of Ethos, Pathos and Logos to manipulate his audience to be on his side, rather than Brutus’s side. These three persuasion tools allow his audience to connect with him and he is able to effectively argue his case against than Brutus. Antony’s first priority is to establish ethos in his speech. Since Brutus is a friend of the powerful Caesar, Antony must transcend his credibility and prove to the Romans…

    • 1389 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In addition to defending a Caesar’s dead body Antony had to go back in the past to things he has done for the people, and he is not even defending himself. Not alone that Antony has to worry about the conspirators, he even sent a servant to the scene of murder to make sure he was not a target on the group of conspirators list. Consequently, leading to Antony fearing for his life while giving his speech. Then after he gave his speech he was able not only calm the crowd, but to convince them to go against the conspirators and want kill them. Overall while Brutus’s speech was exceptional and was able to calm the crowd and change their minds into thinking Caesar was a tyrant.…

    • 1193 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Antony states his direct purpose and asks for his audience’s attention outright, thus creating mutual respect through ethos by addressing his peers as equals. In addition, Antony appeals to the crowd’s emotions by mentioning Caesar’s will and how every citizen lies within in lines 132 and 133 of scene 2 in Act III. This employment of pathos riles up the audience and influences them to join his side, yet it also creates a leash with which Antony ties to the crowd to fulfill his agenda. Continuing, Antony leaves nothing to chance or opinion by focusing on the fact that he has no business in disproving Brutus’ words, but only to speak what he knows (III. ii. 100-101). Antony manipulates ethos in this instance to protect his integrity by addressing that his goal does not lie within feuding with another.…

    • 1018 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    On March 15, 44 BC, Brutus killed Julius Caesar for the freedom and protection of Rome. According to Brutus he says, “I rejoice at it; as he was valiant, I honor him but as he was ambitious, I slew him.” (ll. 26-27). Another reason as to why he killed him was his ambition. Perhaps Brutus thought that Caesar had too much ambition.…

    • 1150 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays