Brutus Persuasive Speeches

Improved Essays
Despite both Mark and Brutus gave persuasive speeches, Mark had more examples to contradict Brutus’s points, while Brutus based his speech off unknown future events. In Mark Antony’s speech he used the rhetorical device logos to explain his logic and stated, “I thrice presented him a kingly crown, Which he did thrice refuse: was this ambitious?” (Stanza 3). There is proof within the quote that Caesar was not ambitious because he did not accept the crown. Mark also adds a rhetorical question to emphasize the point he is making. The rhetorical device logos helps to make Mark’s speech stronger than Brutus’s and by also using another rhetorical device, ethos, Mark’s speech stands out as a powerful argument. As Antony continues to persuade his audience

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Antony's use of the three forms of persuasion was more effective than Brutus's. Antony's use of ethos, pathos, and logos is able to convince the people that he is correct. Brutus manages to convince people shortly in his speech that he is right, but in the end Antony wins. In the beginning of Brutus's speech he states "Believe me for mine honor, and have respect to mine honor that you may believe. "(III:14-15).…

    • 482 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Marc Antony's speech included him talking about Julius Caesar and everything he did to make Rome a better place. He explained to the people how Julius Caesar wanted to help them and he did. He reassured the people that the king was a great person and didn't only want to rule. Brutus had a different opinion when it came to Julius Caesar. He didn't like the way the king ruled and he wanted all the power to himself.…

    • 477 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    All three of these speeches provide exceptional examples of rhetorical devices that are influential in literature. Throughout the duration of Antony’s speech, repetition is used to stress the significance of certain phrases. When referring to Brutus, Antony repeats the phrase, “honorable man” four separate times. This indirectly implies that in Antony’s eyes, Brutus is a sinner, and therefore, he is not honorable.…

    • 1695 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This illustrates how Antony’s over use of pathos supports his sneaking and conniving personality. This also portrays Antony’s evil intentions for the future. Brutus uses logos to gain the support of the Plebeians. He supports his actions with logical reasons. In his speech brutus says, “Had you rather Caesar…

    • 351 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Antony delivered a more effective speech than Brutus by using many rhetorical devices including irony, pathos, . By making his speech emotional and manipulative, Antony convinces the people of Rome to avenge Caesar's death with him. In their speeches, both Brutus and Antony use irony to appeal to the people’s emotions and convince them of different beliefs. One example of irony in Brutus’s speech is in the lines “Who is here so vile…

    • 874 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Rhetoric is defined as “the art of effective or persuasive speaking or writing.” This technique, when used correctly, can be a very powerful tool for politicians. In The Tragedy of Julius Caesar, William Shakespeare demonstrates that a person’s ability to use theatrics and rhetoric effectively can influence their level of support, policies, and political relationships, both positively and negatively. In his speech at Caesar’s funeral, Mark Antony makes his speeches more powerful by using effective rhetoric.…

    • 712 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    After close examination it is clear to see that Antony's use of Ethos, Pathos, and logos is far more persuasive than Brutus argument. Anthony's words strike the word of Brutos. At the beginning of Brutus's speech, he instantly uses ethos by telling the people to remember his honor, which is effective and catches the audience's attention. He remind the audience of his wisdom so they will more easily believe him.…

    • 453 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Act III, Antony stands in front of the group of Plebeians after they have just listened to Brutus, the conspirator’s, reasonings as to why Caesar deserved his death. Mark Antony uses compelling rhetoric, to switch their mindsets, so the commoners pledge to his words instead of Brutus’s. Some may believe Brutus’s leadership skills make him a great speaker, but Mark Antony’s powerful, raw words…

    • 1013 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “The use of rational speech is more distinctive of a human being than the use of his limbs” (Aristotle, Rhetoric). In Aristotle’s book Rhetoric he elaborates on the three rhetorical devices; ethos, logos, and pathos. These devices are found frequently in Shakespeare’s writings, particularly in Julius Caesar. Rhetorical devices are tools of persuasive writing which influence readers through appeals such as credibility, logic, and emotion. To begin, Ethos is a rhetorical device which appeals to credibility or authority.…

    • 463 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    He reminded the people that Caesar would have ruined Rome, become a tyrant and would have enslaved everyone, he said "had you rather Caesar were living, and die all slaves, than that Caesar were dead?". He says this as a rhetorical question: it has quite an obvious answer but probably would have been false anyway. Brutus says that last quote like it is fact and that it will happen. The fact makes it seem more real.…

    • 1412 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In William Shakespeare’s play “Julius Caesar” Mark Antony unleashes a powerful speech during Caesar’s funeral, aiming to persuade the people of Rome that Brutus was fallacious to kill Caesar and that they should avenge his death. In Antony’s oration, he argues his case against Brutus by using the rhetorical strategies of Ethos, Pathos and Logos to manipulate his audience to be on his side, rather than Brutus’s side. These three persuasion tools allow his audience to connect with him and he is able to effectively argue his case against than Brutus. Antony’s first priority is to establish ethos in his speech. Since Brutus is a friend of the powerful Caesar, Antony must transcend his credibility and prove to the Romans…

    • 1389 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In Shakespeare 's Julius Caesar, Marc Antony had the herculean task of turning the Roman population against Brutus and the other conspirators. To do this, Antony needed to follow up Brutus ' powerful oration with a short, supervised speech. Still, in little time Antony had turned the tides and had the Plebeians on his side. He had used certain devices in his speech, several of which include equalization, repetition, emotion, humility, irony, inflation, and anticipation, to aid in his success. Antony 's strategies worked like a charm, and even before his funeral oration had finished he and the conspirators all knew who had the upper hand.…

    • 1348 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Rome Persuasive Speech

    • 1152 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Today we decide the fate of a man who we have all heard to be unfit for our fair city. You have heard correctly, for Catiline is the very definition of filth and so are those who support his ghastly reform knowing full well the wolf in sheep 's hide. He seeks not to help the poor but to eliminate the debt for those who should be and have the resources to pay it back. He aims not to help the poor with their fields, their struggle to feed themselves. He aims not to lift Rome 's poor from the mud of the roads to prosperity but to squirm his way out from underneath the mound of debt he has obtained.…

    • 1152 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Brutus and Mark Antony 's motivation for their speech was almost the opposite of one another to a certain extent. Brutus felt a great amount of sorrow and remorse, and tried to appeal to the ethos and Logos of the public to gain there trust and respect. He also reminisced upon his and Caesars friendship, and very clearly stated he only followed through for the good of Rome. Brutus only desired to stop the tyranny that Julius Caesar was provoking, and protect the health and success of his country. Brutus uses logical and rational ideas and therefore appeals to Logos when he speaks that he killed Caesar because he “loved Rome more.”…

    • 1074 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Brutus Speech Analysis

    • 759 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Which makes it seem like the people in the crowd are participating and forming their own opinions, when Brutus is really forming their thoughts for them knowing that everyone is going to give the same answer. During Mark Antony’s speech he uses the same technique, using repetition and rhetorical questions to prove that Caesar was not ambitious. He states, “He hath brought many captives home to rome,/ Whose ransoms did the general coffers fill./ Did this in Caesar seem ambitious? . . . You all did see that on Lupercal/ I thrice presented him a kingly crown,/ which he did thrice refuse.…

    • 759 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays