INTRODUCTION
Background of the Study
History is full of kings, queens, their ambitions, their vulgar aggrandizements and their cruelties combined with a sybaritic life and eroticism, having no concern for common man who is quashed in every circumstance. The common man has been suffering in every sphere of life by one way or another.
The 16th was the first century when people could rise in society through talent and merit. In previous centuries it was rare for a person to rise above the social station in which he was born. The Tudor kings (Henry VII, Henry VIII, Elizabeth) worked to limit the power of inherited nobility, focusing more power on the throne, partly by promoting people from lower orders of society to positions of government authority. Two of the most powerful men in this play, Cardinal Wolsey and Thomas Cromwell, rose from very lowly origins. But the 20th century …show more content…
His appeal is that history is framed by ideas which bring social justice to mankind. Brutus puts splendid idea; intellectual significance in politics, in front of the people. He tries to give awareness and this awareness for the sake of awareness and for the sake of common man in kingships, democracies, aristocracies and dictatorships. His comments on the action invites the common man to judge, to think-perhaps to readjust to your world what is good and bad for them. It was all about the upbringing of all the conscience versus transcendentalism. The common man has been omitted as for their hegemonic designs prevail. In democracy, run by a few people, the common man and his problems are gone not to discuss but the rulers got elected by them. The elected ones do not inconvenient themselves for the problem of common man. Pakistan has been experiencing the ruling of two parties since 1971, and the common man is being misled by the force rhetoric of the politicians of the two parties
Background of the Study
History is full of kings, queens, their ambitions, their vulgar aggrandizements and their cruelties combined with a sybaritic life and eroticism, having no concern for common man who is quashed in every circumstance. The common man has been suffering in every sphere of life by one way or another.
The 16th was the first century when people could rise in society through talent and merit. In previous centuries it was rare for a person to rise above the social station in which he was born. The Tudor kings (Henry VII, Henry VIII, Elizabeth) worked to limit the power of inherited nobility, focusing more power on the throne, partly by promoting people from lower orders of society to positions of government authority. Two of the most powerful men in this play, Cardinal Wolsey and Thomas Cromwell, rose from very lowly origins. But the 20th century …show more content…
His appeal is that history is framed by ideas which bring social justice to mankind. Brutus puts splendid idea; intellectual significance in politics, in front of the people. He tries to give awareness and this awareness for the sake of awareness and for the sake of common man in kingships, democracies, aristocracies and dictatorships. His comments on the action invites the common man to judge, to think-perhaps to readjust to your world what is good and bad for them. It was all about the upbringing of all the conscience versus transcendentalism. The common man has been omitted as for their hegemonic designs prevail. In democracy, run by a few people, the common man and his problems are gone not to discuss but the rulers got elected by them. The elected ones do not inconvenient themselves for the problem of common man. Pakistan has been experiencing the ruling of two parties since 1971, and the common man is being misled by the force rhetoric of the politicians of the two parties