Brutus And Persuasion

Decent Essays
Show More
the basic difference between the two speeches, is brutus appeals to reason and logic, and mark appeals to emotion. brutus, his speech to the citizens is in character. he gives reasons for killing julius. his speech is full of the word "i", he never once mentioned any of the other conspirators.

Antony is characterized as one who loves pleasure of the sense, this includes lots of wine drinking, and liquor. his main trait is that he is guided by his emotions. he appeals to the citizans his feelings right away. he does this right because hes does have strong feelings about his death.

brutus's speech seemed cold, stiff, formal, rehearsed. brutus planned ahead of time, because he knew it was going to happen, unlike Antony, it took him by complete

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    Antony's Speech Persuasive Essay
    • 114 Words
    • 1 Pages

    Antony's Speech Persuasive Essay

    In my opinion, Antony speech was more delivered better because includes several persuasive details in his speech. After saying that his intent wasn't to praise Caesar, he says, "He was my friend, faithful and just to me. " Antony's speech points out many of Caesar acts that had benefited them as Roman citizens. He plays with their minds saying that Caesar had been generous to them and protected them from the "intruders". He uses rhetorical questions, irony, and etc. to effectively persuade his audience to join his side instead of Brutus'.…

    • 114 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
    Read More
  • Decent Essays

    Comparing Brutus And Mark Antony's Speeches
    • 477 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Comparing Brutus And Mark Antony's Speeches

    Marc Antony's speech included him talking about Julius Caesar and everything he did to make Rome a better place. He explained to the people how Julius Caesar wanted to help them and he did. He reassured the people that the king was a great person and didn't only want to rule. Brutus had a different opinion when it came to Julius Caesar. He didn't like the way the king ruled and he wanted all the power to himself.…

    • 477 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Brutus Ethos In Julius Caesar
    • 880 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Brutus Ethos In Julius Caesar

    He was able to appeal to the audience by saying things that would pull on their emotions. For example, Brutus states, "Had you rather Caesar were living and die all slaves, than that Caesar were dead, to live all free men?” This asks the Roman people if they rather have Caesar be here for them all to be slaves, or have him gone so when they all die they would be free men and women? If Caesar were to stay alive, the Roman people would eventually be slaves because Caesar would be the ruler of Rome. He also stated, “Who is here so vile that will not love his country?”…

    • 880 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Pathos In Julius Caesar
    • 703 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Pathos In Julius Caesar

    Brutus on the other hand, uses only facts which doesn’t give much credibility and there is no bond between him and the crowd. Antony’s precise word choice allows him to even combine pathos and ethos in one phrase. For example, towards the end of the funeral speech, Antony says “But yesterday the word of Caesar might have stood against the world: now he lies there.” Antony appeals to the empathy of the crowd by making them feel sad about his death, especially when he says “now he lies there”. He also shows Caesar was morally good because Caesar was willing to stand against the world just for…

    • 703 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    How Does Antony Use Rhetoric
    • 725 Words
    • 3 Pages

    How Does Antony Use Rhetoric

    However, at the beginning Brutus was able to sway the Roman people to see his side of the story. He included logos and ethos in his argument to make it more effective in gaining the citizens trust. In some aspects the arguments are similar, but one is more effective that the other. Antony's speech is the greater of the two.…

    • 725 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    How Does Brutus Use Ethos In Julius Caesar
    • 534 Words
    • 3 Pages

    How Does Brutus Use Ethos In Julius Caesar

    Both speeches of Brutus and Antony about Caesar’s death were compelling, but Mark Antony’s speech was overall superior to that of Brutus’s, for he won back the Roman people’s loyalty. In Brutus’s speech, he tries to invoke the people of Rome using ethos. Brutus uses ethos to credit himself, saying that the people should trust his words. The people of Rome can trust in his words because he is a part of the government, so in using ethos was an effective way on persuading the people.…

    • 534 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Great Essays

    Brutus's Virtue In Julius Caesar
    • 2437 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Brutus's Virtue In Julius Caesar

    Within the play Julius Caesar, as an audience, we are asked to question every character’s virtue. As the play progresses these lines between good and bad men become increasingly blurred, making it harder for the audience to distinguish the wrong from the right. Ultimately it would appear that every character is filled with both evil and good and it seems as though throughout this play Shakespeare is trying to highlight the unrealism attached to such simplistic ideas. Within Medieval England morality plays were very popular, with one character being clearly bad and another clearly good, but throughout Julius Caesar the audience is shown that every person has their evil side and that life needs a more complex explanation than a simple ‘right…

    • 2437 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Great Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Julius Caesar Rhetorical Analysis
    • 984 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Julius Caesar Rhetorical Analysis

    After reading the two speeches I disagree with Antony stating he is “no orator as Brutus is, but a plain blunt man”(III.ii.220). I disagree with Antony portraying himself as a plain blunt man because the way he speaks to the crowd of Rome reveals his manipulative, selfish and conniving ways. He does not want what is best for Rome, but only what is best for…

    • 984 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Superior Essays

    A Comparison Of The Plebeians In The Tragedy Of Julius Caesar
    • 1217 Words
    • 5 Pages

    A Comparison Of The Plebeians In The Tragedy Of Julius Caesar

    The common man is essential to nearly any piece of literature like how humans need oxygen. This need is exacerbated in plays and novels where the plot is essential in the evaluation of interpretation. This is shown in William Shakespeare’s The Tragedy of Julius Caesar by the plebeians in Act 3 Scene 2. Plebeians in the dramatic text are looked down upon as how they are treated in the first act and how easily they are swayed and stirred.…

    • 1217 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
    Read More
  • Superior Essays

    Rhetorical Analysis Of Brutus's Speech In Julius Caesar
    • 1412 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Rhetorical Analysis Of Brutus's Speech In Julius Caesar

    He reminded the people that Caesar would have ruined Rome, become a tyrant and would have enslaved everyone, he said "had you rather Caesar were living, and die all slaves, than that Caesar were dead?". He says this as a rhetorical question: it has quite an obvious answer but probably would have been false anyway. Brutus says that last quote like it is fact and that it will happen. The fact makes it seem more real.…

    • 1412 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Brutus As A Tragic Hero Essay
    • 1130 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Brutus As A Tragic Hero Essay

    This contributes to the claim that he is a tragic hero in the fact that his judgment and decisions were based on logic, and what would be best for Rome as a whole. Brutus even killed Caesar, his friend, for the good of Rome. He also did not want to join the conspiracy to kill Caesar until he received the fake letters from Cassius. These letters were important because it shows that Brutus listened to the public and wanted to do what appeared to be the right thing. Brutus said, “Set honour in one eye and death i ' the other/…

    • 1130 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Julius Caesar Persuasive Essay
    • 1193 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Julius Caesar Persuasive Essay

    They both had a vigorous crowd and convince them to their side. Even though Brutus had to face the crowd first who wanted his head. He was able to calm them down and convince them Caesar was a tyrant. But, Anthony had to worry about the conspirators killing him if he talks bad about them, defend a Caesar’s corpse, and convince the crowd to go against conspirators. This was a lot of things Mark had to defend against.…

    • 1193 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Superior Essays

    Rhetorical Devices In Marc Antony's Speech
    • 1348 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Rhetorical Devices In Marc Antony's Speech

    In Shakespeare 's Julius Caesar, Marc Antony had the herculean task of turning the Roman population against Brutus and the other conspirators. To do this, Antony needed to follow up Brutus ' powerful oration with a short, supervised speech. Still, in little time Antony had turned the tides and had the Plebeians on his side. He had used certain devices in his speech, several of which include equalization, repetition, emotion, humility, irony, inflation, and anticipation, to aid in his success. Antony 's strategies worked like a charm, and even before his funeral oration had finished he and the conspirators all knew who had the upper hand.…

    • 1348 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Brutus Vs Antony Speech Essay
    • 1018 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Brutus Vs Antony Speech Essay

    Whether public speeches result from those such as Adolf Hitler or Martin Luther King, Jr., their remarkable ability to ignite the population persuades people to take up arms regardless of the cause. In the midst of Act III in The Tragedy of Julius Caesar, Brutus and Antony both speak to the bewildered citizenry regarding Caesar’s demise. Resulting from a handful of conspirators assassinating him in the Senate, Caesar’s death sparks chaos which demands explanation. Thus, some individuals assert Brutus’ speech over Antony’s by claiming that Brutus’ effect and ability to direct his point sooner propel him higher than Antony. Unfortunately, this argument fails to acknowledge Antony’s mightier impact on the audience and his employment of a larger…

    • 1018 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Brutus And Antony's Speech Analysis
    • 834 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Brutus And Antony's Speech Analysis

    The play “Julius Caesar” explained two men named Brutus and Antony who both presented speeches in front of their town with different meanings about the assassination of Caesar. Antony had to ask Brutus for permission to speak at Caesar’s funeral. His despairing emotion and speech drawed the crowds special attention. Antony speech does not show any praise of caesar but does show sympathy and memorable memories that caesar did for his town. This whole situation sums a complete catastrophe.…

    • 834 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More

Related Topics

Ready To Get Started?
Discover
Company
Follow
©2024 Cram.com
Privacy Policy |  About Ads |  Site Map |  Advertise  | 
  • Cookie Settings