Brutus And Marc Antony Speech Analysis

Improved Essays
Marcus Brutus and Marc Anthony both gave superb speeches describing how they feel about Caesar’s death. Both gave good points, were persuasive, specific, and changed the plebeians mind set. First, I will explain Brutus’ speech in simple words. Next, also explain Antony’s in simple words. Then, Compare and contrast these two detailed and complex speeches. Lastly, explain why Brutus was a tragic hero. “Romans, countrymen, and lovers! hear me for my cause, and be silent, that you may hear: believe me for mine honor: and have respect to mine honor, that you may believe..” ( Act 3, Scene 2, Lines 14-17). Brutus starts out his speech by getting the plebeians attention and then explains why he killed Julius Caesar and asks the plebeians to respect …show more content…
Brutus is asking for the plebeians fed back because he wants to know what they are thinking and if he has provided enough information on why he killed Caesar so that they will agree with him. This is a short and simple summarization of Brutus’ speech, he then introduces Marc Anthony to speak at Caesar’s funeral. “Friends, Romans, countrymen, lend me your ears; I come to bury Caesar, not to praise him.” (Act 3, Scene 2, Lines 80-81). Marc Antony is starting his speech out by saying that he doesn 't want to just talk about Caesar the whole time put to just put him to rest in his coffin. “… Brutus is an honorable man…” ( Act 3, Scene 2, Line 89). Throughout Anthony’s speech he will mention that Brutus is an honorable man because before he got permission to speak at Caesar’s funeral the conspirators told him that he to speak highly of them and not faulty. “… Brutus says he was ambitious and he is am honorable man. “He brought many captives home to Rome, whose reason paid the public fund; does this make Caesar seem ambitious?” (Act 3, Scene 2, Lines 93-97). Antony gives facts about Caesar to the plebeians to explain that Caesar isn 't ambitious and wasn 't a tyrant. “Bear with me; My heart is in the coffin …show more content…
He truly believed that Caesar would have become a tyrant, because of that Brutus put his country before his friends and even his family to join the conspiracy to kill Caesar. Even though Caesar was his friend, Brutus ' loyalty as a Roman citizen came first. Brutus ' tragic flaw is that he is not a very good judge of character, and he trusts Cassius too much. He also underestimates Marc Antony and allows him to speak to the crowd after Caesar 's death. Although Antony does as promised in that he does not say anything against the conspirators, his use of verbal irony and dramatic actions turns the crowd into an angry mob. When Brutus finally realizes his role in the destruction of Rome was worse than he believed Caesar would have done, Brutus commits

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    Brutus’s speech seemed short and did not explain a lot. His speech was very short compared to Antony’s long speech and hardly included any detail, which is something very important to making a claim to win over the people of Rome. He only made one or two arguments that the majority of people agreed with and; in addition, Antony conducted a long speech full of detail and emotion that captured Rome’s citizens’ attention. During Antony’s speech, he cried which I am sure made his audience feel his pain of losing their emperor. Antony allowed his audience to feel a sense of grief and a time of mourning over their newly dead…

    • 1236 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    All throughout Brutus’s speech he made the point directly and indirectly that he killed Caesar for the people. He rose against Caesar because it wasn’t that “I loved Caesar less, but that I loved Rome more” in which proclaimed the reasoning for killing Caesar (3.2.23-24). By revealing these words, Brutus is providing logical reasoning behind his actions. He didn’t just killed Caesar for himself but for the good of the people. The Romans praised Brutus for his actions and declared him their hero because to the Romans, they think Brutus saved them from Caesar. This was an effective part of Brutus’s speech however, Antony’s emotion will effect the people more. In contrast to Brutus, Antony used a lot of emotional appeals towards the Romans. In one way, Antony points out the people that before Brutus killed Caesar they didn’t have any problems with Caesar’s ways of ruling. The Romans “all did love him once” because Caesar did no wrong to the people…

    • 753 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Brutus’ claim is that he killed Julius Caesar for the good of Rome. He stresses this point all throughout the speech. In the first half of his speech he bluntly says,”Not that I loved Caesar less, but I loved Rome more. Had you rather Caesar were living and die all slaves, than that Caesar were dead, to live all free men?”” In saying this, he makes sure the people know that he did love Caesar, yet the wellbeing of Rome was more important to him. Brutus also brings a seemingly harsh reality onto the audience, almost appearing to be trying to evoke a thankful attitude from the people. He wants them to think that they had been saved from being enslaved, and that he was their savior. Through arranging the speech in this way, so as to stress that Rome is his first priority, he is also making sure to reinforce his role as a rising leader in…

    • 759 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    William Shakespeare is regarded as the greatest writer in the English language. He is well-known for many of his works such as Romeo and Juliet, Hamlet, A Midsummer Night’s Dream, etc. Along with these works is “The Tragedy of Julius Caesar”. In “The Tragedy of Julius Caesar”, Shakespeare writes two very well known speeches that are delivered by the characters Brutus and Mark Antony during the funeral of Julius Caesar. In speeches, Shakespeare uses ethos, pathos and logos on behalf of Mark Antony and Brutus to persuade the citizens of their own beliefs.…

    • 523 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Citizens of Rome, do not lend me your ears, but instead lend me your heart. I stand before you on this tragic day to acknowledge the death of Marcus Brutus. Brutus, who was once the most respected, noble, and honorable man in all of Rome, now lies before us dead, more worthless than dust. Brutus was a stoic judge and the best friend of Julius Caesar, further demonstrating his high status and his nobility. His grievous death was caused by his dire desire for honor and his extraordinary view of idealism. Cassius, one of Brutus’ dearest friends, was aware of Brutus’ tragic flaw, his weakness for honor and his idealistic view of people. With his venomous and manipulative tongue, Cassius convinced Brutus to join the conspiracy and kill Julius Caesar. Unlike the envious Cassius, Brutus believed Caesar’s death was necessary for the prosperity of Rome. Brutus was blindsided by his desire…

    • 787 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Brutus’ speech rationalized Caesar’s murder by using logic and reasoning because he did not want the plebeians to turn on him. Therefore, he believed that he could persuade the crowd by using reasoning. Brutus states, “As Caesar loved me, I weep for him;/ as he was fortunate I rejoice at it; as he was/ valiant, I honour him: but, as he was ambitious, I/ slew him”(3.2.24-27). This quote conveyed that Brutus loved Caesar, but he loved Rome more and that Caesar needed to be killed because he became too ambitious. Additionally, Brutus wanted the people to know that he loved Caesar by stating that he was very valiant and honorable. Brutus used pros, which is everyday language used by the common people because he wanted to show the crowd that he was one of them. Brutus started his speech by saying, “Romans, countrymen and lovers!...”(3.2.13) which showed that he was very loyal…

    • 863 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Continuing off of changing their opinion in favor of Caesar, they now change it against him and celebrate his death. The Plebeians’ opinion on Caesar’s death begins to change when the First Plebeian says, “I will hear Brutus speak” (3.2.9). This opens up their minds to hearing the reasons in which the conspirators killed Caesar. Although this statement does not ensure the Plebeians will completely change their views, it definitely foreshadows that it will happen. Brutus responds by first stating, “If there be any in this assembly, any dear friend of Caesar’s, to him I say that Brutus’ love to Caesar was no less than his” (3.2.19-21). By opening out with this, he addresses the Plebeians by relating to them saying the death was nothing personal to Caesar and that he loved him just as they did. He also talks in pros which is the language of the common folk where there are multiple punctuation so on the same line. By doing so, he does not talk to them, but rather with them and it helps to relate him to what has just happened. Brutus finishes by saying, “Then none have I offended. I have done no more to Caesar than you shall do to Brutus” (3.2.38-39). Brutus killed Caesar for Rome, for the common folk, they should be on his side because of this. After this the plebeians yell, “Live, Brutus, live, live!” (3.2.50). Now the Plebeians’ opinions have been completely switched after…

    • 1120 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Likewise, Brutus told the people that he is willing to kill himself for the sake of Rome when he said, “With this I depart, that, as I slew my best lover for the good of Rome, I have the same dagger for myself, when it shall please my country to need my death.” When he says this, it makes the audience feel loved, and grateful, that Brutus cares about them. He switched the roles and made the people realize his hard…

    • 791 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Unfortunately, some individuals affirm Marc Antony’s employment of ethos and pathos as brainwashing his audience to follow his will without personal thought. These individuals, however, overlook the idea that Marc Antony surfaces the people’s own thoughts on the morality of the assassination. For example, Antony commences his eulogy by addressing the audience and asking them to “lend [him their] ears; / [He comes] to bury Caesar, not to praise him” (III. ii. 73-74). Antony states his direct purpose and asks for his audience’s attention outright, thus creating mutual respect through ethos by addressing his peers as equals. In addition, Antony appeals to the crowd’s emotions by mentioning Caesar’s will and how every citizen lies within in lines 132 and 133 of scene 2 in Act III. This employment of pathos riles up the audience and influences them to join his side, yet it also creates a leash with which Antony ties to the crowd to fulfill his agenda. Continuing, Antony leaves nothing to chance or opinion by focusing on the fact that he has no business in disproving Brutus’ words, but only to speak what he knows (III. ii. 100-101). Antony manipulates ethos in this instance to protect his integrity by addressing that his goal does not lie within feuding with another.…

    • 1018 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Imagine losing a best friend and never saying goodbye.Imagine witnessing their last breath as they are brutally murdered. Imagine having to stand in front of a crowd trying to reason their death. In Shakespeare’s The Tragedy Julius Caesar, Mark Antony has to fill these dreadful shoes after witnessing the murder of his closest friend, Julius Caesar. In Act III, Antony stands in front of the group of Plebeians after they have just listened to Brutus, the conspirator’s, reasonings as to why Caesar deserved his death. Mark Antony uses compelling rhetoric, to switch their mindsets, so the commoners pledge to his words instead of Brutus’s. Some may believe Brutus’s leadership skills make him a great speaker, but Mark Antony’s powerful, raw words…

    • 1013 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    According to John Morley, “Three things matter in a speech - who says it, how he says it, and what he says, and of the three, the latter matters the least.” John understancds that how the speaker presents himself and his ideas can change the side of the crowd, more than any word they could have said. When Brutus and Antony give their funeral speeches in Julius Caesar it is a critical moment for each. Both need to sway the crowd to agree with their perspective. While Brutus addresses the crowd with logic and reason, Antony uses emotion. The use of rhetorical questions, parallel structure, and repetition by Brutus and Antony throughout their speeches changes the views of the crowd and what they should believe.…

    • 1002 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Before Antony’s speech, the crowd calls the deceased Caesars names and acknowledge Brutus as if he was their savior. Brutus ask the crowding a very common-sensed question whether if they didn’t loved Rome and freedom, majority of the crowd answered no. Immediately after the crowd answered the risky question Caesar had to be immediately killed. What Antony did for his own good and maybe others explained that he is a calm man who allows common sense to answer his questions and others as well. Antony does not seek action with resisting Caesar’s murder but his words spoke a bit louder if he were to act on the situation. Brutus is of course a “good man of Rome” but the decisions he chooses and ideas that come to his mind aren’t as reasonable and necessary as…

    • 834 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Brutus and Mark Antony 's motivation for their speech was almost the opposite of one another to a certain extent. Brutus felt a great amount of sorrow and remorse, and tried to appeal to the ethos and Logos of the public to gain there trust and respect. He also reminisced upon his and Caesars friendship, and very clearly stated he only followed through for the good of Rome. Brutus only desired to stop the tyranny that Julius Caesar was provoking, and protect the health and success of his country. Brutus uses logical and rational ideas and therefore appeals to Logos when he speaks that he killed Caesar because he “loved Rome more.” Brutus tries to justify his and other conspirators actions, to relieve any intense emotions or potent tension. Brutus also connects with the citizens of Rome as referring to them in his greeting: “Romans, countrymen, lovers.” This engaged some of the audience specifically, as well as making them feel as though Brutus sought of them as friends and equal to him. As well as this, it made the audience feel like he values and respects them for all the work they have done for the success of…

    • 1074 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Mark Antony: A True Hero

    • 282 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Notwithstanding the greatness of his loyalty, Mark Antony displays many other indications of being a hero, an example of such being his favor in the eyes of the Roman people. The people of Rome chose to side with Antony over Brutus, when each character gave their funeral speeches after the death of Caesar. Brutus gave to the people his reasoning for killing Caesar, yet Antony only praised his deceased friend and never once tried to directly disprove the conspirator’s word. As Antony’s speech goes on his listeners fondness for him noticeably grows, the plebeians words show this well. The character of Third Plebeian says, even before the speech comes to an end, “There’s not a nobler man in Rome than Antony.” Not long after these words are spoken…

    • 282 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Brutus Speech Analysis

    • 759 Words
    • 4 Pages

    After Caesar’s death, in the play Julius Caesar by William Shakespeare, the conspirators and Mark Antony speak to the public to explain what has happened to Caesar. Brutus, one of the main conspirators and Caesar’s best friend, talks first and gives the Romans the reason as to why Caesar had to be killed. Brutus’ speech is very convincing and he manipulates the crowd into believing him easily. After Brutus speaks, Mark Antony, Caesar’s good friend and second in command, gives a speech about Caesar and how he did not deserve to die, easily turning the crowd against Brutus and the other conspirators. Both speeches use persuasive techniques, like ethos, and rhetorical devices, like repetition and rhetorical questions, to manipulate their audiences…

    • 759 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays