Factual and Background
Count one of the superseding indictment alleges that defendant knowingly and intentionally made a false, fictitious and fraudulent statement to a Federal Agent about her personal knowledge of Joey L. Brunson, being in the vicinity of her residence at 401 Walker Dr. On February 9, 2016.
Special Agent Greenan of the F.B.I states in the criminal complaint that he wrote with no corroboration of any reliable evidence that on the date in question a 2006 BMW 750. Registered to the defendant (Pagan Barnes) arrived at her home at approx. 10:57 a.m. And left at approx..1:35 p.m. And that Joey Brunson was the operator of that vehicle during that time.
The government’s primary evidence of …show more content…
The government's failure to notify me about the warrant has long surpassed the limitations of delayed notice by 30 days. I did not receive any notice until July 2016 when my lawyer gave me a copy of the warrant. Pursuant to 18 U.S.C: 2515 which plainly states that “ Whenever any wire or oral communication has been intercepted, no part of the contents of such communications and no evidence derived therefore may be admitted into evidence in any proceeding if the disclosure of that information would be in violation of this chapter.” 18 USC: 2515. The statute goes on to state that “any aggrieved person may move to suppress the contents of any wire or oral communication intercepted pursuant to this chapter” 18 USC: 2818 United States v. Lonnell Glover Nos.09-3087. 10-3048. 10-3066. Also, see United States v. Scurry Nos. 12-3101. 12-3105. 12-3109. 13-3055-
Count one of the superseding indictment alleges that defendant knowingly and intentionally made a false, fictitious and fraudulent statement to a Federal Agent about her personal knowledge of Joey L. Brunson, being in the vicinity of her residence at 401 Walker Dr. On February 9, 2016.
Special Agent Greenan of the F.B.I states in the criminal complaint that he wrote with no corroboration of any reliable evidence that on the date in question a 2006 BMW 750. Registered to the defendant (Pagan Barnes) arrived at her home at approx. 10:57 a.m. And left at approx..1:35 p.m. And that Joey Brunson was the operator of that vehicle during that time.
The government’s primary evidence of …show more content…
The government's failure to notify me about the warrant has long surpassed the limitations of delayed notice by 30 days. I did not receive any notice until July 2016 when my lawyer gave me a copy of the warrant. Pursuant to 18 U.S.C: 2515 which plainly states that “ Whenever any wire or oral communication has been intercepted, no part of the contents of such communications and no evidence derived therefore may be admitted into evidence in any proceeding if the disclosure of that information would be in violation of this chapter.” 18 USC: 2515. The statute goes on to state that “any aggrieved person may move to suppress the contents of any wire or oral communication intercepted pursuant to this chapter” 18 USC: 2818 United States v. Lonnell Glover Nos.09-3087. 10-3048. 10-3066. Also, see United States v. Scurry Nos. 12-3101. 12-3105. 12-3109. 13-3055-