2. Brownmiller’s essay is a call to action to women, particularly, feminists. Brownmiller definitely holds her audience’s attention, especially with the use of imagery in which she describes pornographic magazines as portraying women’s bodies as “chopped-up parts of the female anatomy, packaged like cuts of meat at the supermarket.
3. Brownmiller should have included if and only if to enforce that the three-part test only regarded material as obscene when evidence of patently offensive, hard-core sexual conduct; lack serious scientific, literary, artistic, or political value; and appeal to the prurient interest of an …show more content…
I do think that the “free-speech abridgements” are valid evidence when arguing to limit pornographic displays. The reason these “free-speech abridgements” such as the falsely shouting “fire” in a crowded theater and using misleading advertisements are not allowed and supported, are because people understand and agree that it is for the benefit of society to ban the spread of malicious information. Similarly, one could make the case that pornography displayed also causes harm to society and should not be so obviously displayed. A restriction on displays would merely provide security for society without effecting personal