He believed that pay alone was not sufficient to motivate employees to put forth their best effort and I agree with his theory. Within my own workgroup, during 1:1 conversations with my employees it is evident that pay doesn’t drive most of the employees, it is in fact a feeling of being appreciated and respected. An example of this is, before any new project is kicked off, we allow the employees who are assigned to the project to be the ones who decide the workflow for it. It is important to include them in this process, as it encourages teamwork and, they are the ones who do the job and know what the processes should be. Since beginning this process we have seen considerable increases in our employee engagement …show more content…
Adoption meets the criteria for approved leave under this law. Her company is required to give her FMLA since they employ more than 50 employees.
Steven will not be eligible for FMLA when he has his knee surgery. He has not worked for his company the required 12 months nor completed the 1250 required hours. His company has only 30 employees, instead of the 50 required, therefore they are not required by law to provider FMLA for Steven, even if he met the other criteria.
I am a proponent of the FMLA law and deal with it quit frequently as a manager at my company. I do not agree however with the law’s restrictions around being employed for 12 months. I feel that in the case of Steven, he should be eligible for FMLA. Knee surgery is not a planned event and I do not feel he should have the added stress of worrying about losing his job and benefits due to something that he has no control over. While I wholly support adoption, I feel that Steven should receive the same benefit as