3,497 pitbulls have been out down since the Breed specific legislation or (B.S.L). Breed Specific Legislation targets a certain type of dogs based on their appearance. Breed Specific Legislation (B.S.L) is a law passed that restricts certain types of dogs due to them perceived as dangerous. Breed Specific Legislation shouldn't be a law because the dog mimics the owners actions and it discriminates against certain dog breeds.
First of all Breed Specific Legislation should not be a law because the dog mimics the owners actions. Dogs adopt a “look and learn” behavior. They mimic the owners actions when being trained. Unless a pitbull has been trained poorly or have been trained purposely to be aggressive. Dog-aggression and People-aggression …show more content…
Not proper training has lead to thousands of dogs being put down. A innocent dog shouldn't be put down. The owners should be punished.
Furthermore Breed Specific Legislation should not be a law because it is discrimination against certain dog breeds.
The reasons why Breed Specific Legislation should not exist a dog labeled as “aggressive” or have been known to bite people aren't always the breeds you think. A Labrador retriever has a 13.3% with the most common dog attacks. While a pitbull has a 8.4% chance of attacking according to Chicago injury center. Most dogs are well behaved and a dog may appear dangerous and it is a stereotype. My evidence here shows why Breed Specific Legislation is a stereotyping dogs.
Also the Chihuahua breed is ranked number one on dog bite statistics according to the Caine Journal. “The idea that dogs personalities are affected by their experiences key component of dog training.”-Lauren Davis from io9 3/14/14. ”This work provides good scientific evidence to explain why the pursuit by government of Breed Specific Legislation to reduce the risk of harm to citizens is not only doomed to fail, but giving people false of security.”- Professor Deniel Mills of The University of London
First of all Breed Specific Legislation should not be a law because the dog mimics the owners actions. Dogs adopt a “look and learn” behavior. They mimic the owners actions when being trained. Unless a pitbull has been trained poorly or have been trained purposely to be aggressive. Dog-aggression and People-aggression …show more content…
Not proper training has lead to thousands of dogs being put down. A innocent dog shouldn't be put down. The owners should be punished.
Furthermore Breed Specific Legislation should not be a law because it is discrimination against certain dog breeds.
The reasons why Breed Specific Legislation should not exist a dog labeled as “aggressive” or have been known to bite people aren't always the breeds you think. A Labrador retriever has a 13.3% with the most common dog attacks. While a pitbull has a 8.4% chance of attacking according to Chicago injury center. Most dogs are well behaved and a dog may appear dangerous and it is a stereotype. My evidence here shows why Breed Specific Legislation is a stereotyping dogs.
Also the Chihuahua breed is ranked number one on dog bite statistics according to the Caine Journal. “The idea that dogs personalities are affected by their experiences key component of dog training.”-Lauren Davis from io9 3/14/14. ”This work provides good scientific evidence to explain why the pursuit by government of Breed Specific Legislation to reduce the risk of harm to citizens is not only doomed to fail, but giving people false of security.”- Professor Deniel Mills of The University of London