Once a child has started to curse, they have the choice of going down the path of continuing to curse or the path of stopping once in awhile. When that child hears in the media, whether it be television, the music that the child listens to, or on their phones, it’s completely harmless because they know their is nothing that can be done to stop it. When a baby/ ten year old hears it on the media, however, they can actually remember the word, because their minds are still being made, and they can remember the words a lot. They then tend to repeat the words, especially if someone they know has said it, and that’s when the cursing media becomes bad. It’s also bad, considering, the fact that if the parents finds out, the parent will blame the media from which the child heard it, and might do things about it, or nothing at all. Cursing is a part of life, no matter what you do, there is eventually nothing that can be done. Should the NYT be able to publish curse words? I don’t care, I think yes because not doing it twould be a violation of Freedom of the Press and Freedom of Speech. Also, when someone curses in a paper, that’s going to get more people to read it, and become more trustworthy because they are recording the bad things in life, not sugarcoating
Once a child has started to curse, they have the choice of going down the path of continuing to curse or the path of stopping once in awhile. When that child hears in the media, whether it be television, the music that the child listens to, or on their phones, it’s completely harmless because they know their is nothing that can be done to stop it. When a baby/ ten year old hears it on the media, however, they can actually remember the word, because their minds are still being made, and they can remember the words a lot. They then tend to repeat the words, especially if someone they know has said it, and that’s when the cursing media becomes bad. It’s also bad, considering, the fact that if the parents finds out, the parent will blame the media from which the child heard it, and might do things about it, or nothing at all. Cursing is a part of life, no matter what you do, there is eventually nothing that can be done. Should the NYT be able to publish curse words? I don’t care, I think yes because not doing it twould be a violation of Freedom of the Press and Freedom of Speech. Also, when someone curses in a paper, that’s going to get more people to read it, and become more trustworthy because they are recording the bad things in life, not sugarcoating