(2014) study, because of an increase in women’s labor force participation, workers report an increase in work-family conflict and report growing expectations for fathers’ commitment to caring for children. One purpose of their study is to determine if changing the social structure, everyday practices and interactions, in the workplace, can help workers differentiate between personal and professional responsibilities. Essentially, the researchers seek to change working conditions, to help reduce personal versus professional boundary conflict. The investigators report that a genuinely supportive workplace culture that helps eliminate personal issues also contributes to healthier workers and a healthier work environment. Organizations should implement or reinforce policies or procedures that help differentiate between work issues and personal issues. And OC volunteers report that they do not discuss personal issues with clients to help eliminate the possibility of …show more content…
The researcher notes that the craft is bound by a code of ethics, but psychologists are not bound by the code of ethics guidelines when outside of their professions. At the end of the article, the reader learns that Haeny recommends that a psychologist should take whatever measures necessary to ensure that professional interests do not interfere or influence personal life, including social media interactions. Haeny notes that behavior during personal time can have harmful effects on professional relationships. There is no need, then, to stretch the imagination to attempt to understand that similar boundary restraint parallels exist between psychologists and volunteers. At the OC, volunteers avoid discussing personal issues or problems with clients. According to survey some LNRA responses, OC volunteers take the reasonable measures necessary to ensure that professional interests do not interfere with personal life and vice