Byer And Celia Cellar Case Study

The scenario between Boris Byer and Celia Cellar is an interesting case. Some people would consider this agreement more of a lackadaisical approach while others could see this as an acceptable and reasonable contact. While setting all emotions aside, the real issue of concern is whether the agreement between Boris Byer and Celia Cellar is strong enough to be a contract. To understand if Boris Byer and Celia Cellars agreement would reflect a valid contract, it is best to look at the essential elements of the contract. Is there a contract in this case, what is the status of the contract, does the napkin have any significance, and then drawing a conclusion to determine if Boris Byer and Celia Cellar have a contract. First, we must examine the facts of the situation and apply it to our equation of the essential elements of a contract.
In the summary of our reading, a contract is not valid unless it contains the essential elements of a contract (Mayer, Warner, Siedel, & Lieberman, 2014). The first element is the agreement. The agreement has several levels that include an offer, acceptance and serious intention. The definition of an offer is one of the parties that …show more content…
For Byer and Cellar, they have a valid contract. As for the rest of the definitions, Byer and Cellar case does not apply. A void contract is missing an essential element. For example, I will sell you my car, but I do not have one to sell. A voidable contract works the same way as the void contract by missing essential elements, but the decision to enforce the contract is between the parties. A voidable contract, one of the parties is legally responsible to honor the agreement. The unenforceable is a contract that in my mind is simply unenforceable, meaning that the contract is too confusing or lacking several elements. After signing the napkin, does the napkin have any