Book Banning In Schools

Superior Essays
Book Banning In Schools Have you ever been in a school library looking for a specific book to read and you couldn’t find it? Have you ever asked your librarian why you couldn’t find it? Has you librarian ever told you that it was banned from the school library? Do you know that feeling? That feeling of loss when you realise you favorite book has been banned and you won’t be able to find it and read it. That feeling when you hear about a book and instantly want to read it. That disappointed feeling you have when you can’t find it. Has that ever happened to you? Book banning in schools should be stopped because it doesn’t help prepare students for adult life, discourages normal teenage behavior, books are being banned unfairly. Have you ever …show more content…
In the beginning it was understandable. Parents didn’t want their children to read majorly inappropriate books. Now, though, parents and teachers have gotten a little crazy. Books are being banned unfairly in schools just because a couple parents didn’t like their content. For example, To Kill a Mockingbird was banned in some schools in America because some parents thought that it was supporting and encouraging white supremacy. To Kill a Mockingbird is a popular book all around. Plenty of kids enjoy reading it. Plenty of people would disagree with this claim. Do you think the people who thought the book was ok got a say in whether or not to ban it? No. They didn’t. If they had the book might still be in schools. To ban a book you only need three reasons to do it. Anyone can make up three reasons of why a book should be banned. Where the Wild Things Are is another book that was banned. You might be thinking, ‘Why? This is a child’s book. There is nothing wrong with it.’ Apparently despite what most people think, a few parents thought that this book was to dark for children to be reading. Sure, the book may be a little dark, but that is no reason to ban it from a school library. You may think that it is inappropriate, but other parents might not. Other parents might be ok with their child reading Where the Wild Things Are. If you don’t your child to read that book, then instead of banning it, tell your child that they are not allowed to read it. The Scarlet Letter was banned in school because it conflicted with someone’s values. If a book is conflicting with your values, don’t read it. Just because it is conflicting your values doesn’t mean that it is conflicting with others values. Every single person on this entire planet has different values. Not everyone is the same. Schools need to stop thinking that. Again if you don’t want your child to read something, don’t let them read it! Books should not be banned based on a few

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    There was never a real start to banning books, people were always trying to get rid of “harmful books”, and up until the invention of the printing press in 1450, the only thing you needed to do to ban a book was burn it. For a book to be banned, it has to first be challenged and then proven unfit for what kind of person would be reading it. The reasons for ban include sexual situations or dialog, profanity, encouragement of "damaging" lifestyles, violence or negativity, racial issues, books that include magic or witchcraft themes, such as Harry Potter, religious affiliations, and political bias. Parents argue that they know their children better and that their child’s education follows the parent’s choices, which is true, but that doesn’t mean that you should be banning books for no reason.…

    • 966 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    According to the American Library Association 11,300 books have been challenged since 1982. The school board has banned many books for no reason. The novel The House on Mango Street is an example of one of these many banned books. The TUSD board banned this book because it “promotes the overthrow of the US government, promotes resentment to a race or class of people, and is designed primarily for one ethnic group.” Clearly you can tell that the school board banned this book without doing their research, because it never talked about the overthrow of the government. Also books should be able to have diversity and be different. All students should be able to have, the opportunity, to be educated about The House on Mango Street.…

    • 740 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The banning and challenging of a book is typically decided by parents, school staff, and district officials. For a book to be challenged it has to be attempted to be removed or restricted. It is, again, based upon the objections or parents and school officials. Unlike a challenge a banning of a book is the removal of material that is getting challenged. Most of the time challenges and banning’s are motivated by the desire to protect the children from what people think may be inappropriate content, typically sexual or against a religion or sometimes because it promotes a certain religion. A substantial amount of time censorship or banning of books are inconspicuous, often imperceptible as well as blatant and overt, but none the less…

    • 810 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The reasons most books are banned is because it put the pure innocence of children at risk. Which is a valid fear of a parent to have, but it is also important to make sure children are prepared for the real world and all that come with it, good and bad. In teaching these banned books with controversial topics, we are not only educating about the history of these afflictions, but teaching how them how to cope with and fight against them in life. It is impossible to teach someone right from wrong without mentioning the wrongs. I believe teaching these banned books is important to the civic engagement of the children of the future as well as their total…

    • 719 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Always trying to constantly be like someone else or have the same morals because that is the popular route to go. Book censorship, in this way, is much like our society. It leads to one central idea: conformity. The few individuals who fight for the bannings of books are all drawn to the idea that everyone should and does function if not have the same morals as them. Our society also teaches us that it is not right to coerce the thoughts of some but inhibit the efforts of another. Libraries should be able to offer information on contrasting viewpoints on historical issues. This should not be removed because of differing partisan or doctrinal views. Oscar Wilde once wrote that “The books that the world calls immoral are the books that shows the world it’s shame”. When books are banned it illustrates the world as having their eyes closed. We refuse to see anything else or anything new that is not of tasteful nature. We preach about purity, but the world is anything but pure. it is a dark, sinister place. Sensors pervert and destroy our views of the world. From this, as children, we were only thought about the benevolent factors of life but never about the hard painful lesson that we would eventually face as we get older. The world is an impure, filthy place. In a study of book banning and why they were banned, 28.2% of books were banned because of sexually explicit material. (Book Challenges) Many of…

    • 1059 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In a few areas a great book, To Kill a Mockingbird, and many books like it are being banned. To Kill a Mockingbird is a very informative book on what life was like in the 1930’s, but it is still being banned for strong language, “strong content”, and strong cases of racism. Many schools have had kids read that book, but because of recent events a few have started to ban it. Some people believe that they can teach messages like the ones taught from this book, but in a better way, so they make it more suitable for kids to read. Some citizens feel that kids should be introduced to strong topics like this when they are in around 8th grade, which is a very common time for schools to have children/teens to read this novel in school, because kids need to be prepared for the real world early on. To Kill a Mockingbird is a very…

    • 1467 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Fortunately, for every group pushing for bans on literature, there are organizations that fight for this freedom. One such organization is the American Civil Liberties Union. In the year 2000, when discussing the topic of book banning, the organization stated that, “Permitting restraints on literature sets the stage for attacks on all expression that is artistically or politically controversial or that portrays unpleasant realities of life” (American Civil Liberties Union). Although some books may contain graphic violence or sexual content, and therefore of course should be kept out of the hands of children, I’d like to think that these widespread en masse bans of such literature are a poor way to go about it. It’s not as if middle or high school students are incapable of understanding and comprehending dark or more adult subject matter. In fact, it’s highly likely that they themselves have shared similar experiences to books that deal with depression, violence, or sex. When his book Whale Talk was banned in a school district, young-adult novelist Chris Crutcher addressed the students in that county in an article speaking on the matter. When the book was banned due to a parent finding the language in certain passage obscene, he responded to the students with, “Let me tell you something else I think is obscene. I think it obscene that your school board doesn 't trust you enough to know you can read harsh stories, told in their native tongue, and make decisions for yourself what you think of the issues or the language” (Crutcher). I would certainly agree with this…

    • 1307 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Reasons For Banning Books

    • 983 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Novels may contain coarse language or racial themes, and many more topics and have been banned because of these ideas. Simply having offensive content is not a valid reason to ban a book. More classics such as Harper Lee’s To Kill a Mockingbird, or Sherman Alexie’s The Absolutely True Diary of a Part-Time Indian have faced bans for, according to Beery, “…exploring racial themes or depicting racism directed at various groups of people.” Racism and prejudice exist in the real world, obviously, and exposing children to these themes shows them reality, which helps them differentiate between fantasy and reality. Kurt Vonnegut said in “I Am Very Real,” “…words really don’t damage children much…” and “It was evil deeds and lying that hurt us.” The content of the novels doesn’t influence a child to become a bad person, but introducing and teaching them about the content is what really matters. Additionally, books containing descriptions and themes of drug-ridden or homosexual lifestyles have also had the unfortunate demise by being banned. While this may not be the most appropriate for children, if the reader can perceive what the novel is trying to say, it should not be banned. People should be exposed to lifestyles that are different than their own because it can help them become more tolerant and understanding of different people. So, while some novels may have offensive content, they should not be banned because they can serve as a way to expose the masses to topics they may not hear about or are not usually comfortable…

    • 983 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Banning Books In Schools

    • 583 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Banning books is a topic that’s on everybody's mind. Some people believe that we should ban books due to many reasons, others have different opinions. Books should notshouldn’t be banned from the library because not every student is on the same reading level, students have different interests in books, and mature students find mature books more interesting.…

    • 583 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The banning of books is unfit for a classroom setting in which students are taught to be creative and show their imagination. The book To Kill A Mockingbird was banned for the use of “inappropriate” language, but schools are still teaching the letter that M.L.K. wrote from Birmingham Jail which uses the same language. Some will argue that the Birmingham letter is of historical significance but if you really think about it To Kill…

    • 263 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Kids should be able to freely read whatever books they want because they can learn life lessons from books that are banned. Banning books takes away some very good books for kids to learn from and could be taking away from something they like to do. Kids can learn things about religion and other things from the past and you can help them understand what…

    • 345 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Banning books do not help anyone, banning a book in a library makes it more difficult for other people to read the book if they can not afford to by the book.The definition of a banned book is a work that contains material that has been deemed inappropriate, offensive, or dangerous by certain people or organizations. The people that challenge the books are usually parents of school children (Shumaker).…

    • 479 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Banning Books

    • 1239 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Book banning leaves others ignorant on the topics and themes found inside the books; it would be better for others to become educated on the topics, not left blind and ready to repeat mankind's past mistakes. Book banning, as it leaves ignorance in it wake, also forces mankind to stop its development, with it not being aware of both new and old ideas that challenge and grow society. Lastly, it takes away the freedom of speech and choice. No group can decide for any individual what they can believe and think, and no person should not be allowed to speak what they wish to. 93 percent of high school students out of a pool of 30 contended that they were against book banning, showing that a future where banning books has ended has a high chance of existing (Ontario High School). Education, progression, and freedom are the future of mankind, and with book banning continuing to occur, all futures are…

    • 1239 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Banning Books In Schools

    • 672 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Some people may think that books should be banned because there might be inappropriate parts or something that goes against their beliefs. Even if the book does have parts in it that the parent or guardian does not like, but they can always tell them if they can or can’t read it. For example, the parent may want to read the novel but does not want their child to read the story. In that case the book should not be banned because the parent could tell their child not to read it. Banning novels for those reasons can also stop a grown adult from indulging in the…

    • 672 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The problem with censoring books in schools is very simple if you think about it. It is literally the process of not allowing books into a school. The problem is not that we want to read these really old, boring books, it is the idea of it. Banning a book is not allowing us to read material that we wish to (Book banning reaching). Those boring old books have meaning to them, and the more ‘inappropriate’ it is deemed, the more meaning it has. Huckleberry Finn is a great example.…

    • 770 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays