The author knew how to write poetically because there are so many literary facets within the book as a whole. The book of Esther “portrays history with all the artistry of great literature and is described as a literary delight told with satire, irony, and humor” (Jobes). The unknown author and the beauty in the literature made biblical scholars uneasy and “Martin Luther wished the book of Esther did not exist” he lamented that it had pagan indiscretions (Mclarity). Also, the judgment of the book of Esther as “historical fiction was based upon the free style of composition, as well as the remarkable knowledge of the Persian Empire world and its customs” (Murphy). I will explore the reason for and against the book of Esther as history though dates, names, storytelling abilities and divine intervention. There is plenty reasons to believe that the book of Esther was in fact history but there is also a great amount of evidence to question its legitimacy in
The author knew how to write poetically because there are so many literary facets within the book as a whole. The book of Esther “portrays history with all the artistry of great literature and is described as a literary delight told with satire, irony, and humor” (Jobes). The unknown author and the beauty in the literature made biblical scholars uneasy and “Martin Luther wished the book of Esther did not exist” he lamented that it had pagan indiscretions (Mclarity). Also, the judgment of the book of Esther as “historical fiction was based upon the free style of composition, as well as the remarkable knowledge of the Persian Empire world and its customs” (Murphy). I will explore the reason for and against the book of Esther as history though dates, names, storytelling abilities and divine intervention. There is plenty reasons to believe that the book of Esther was in fact history but there is also a great amount of evidence to question its legitimacy in