Book Censorship

Improved Essays
Books should be uncensored for they teach what parents are afraid of teaching their children while they’re young. However, some people have opposing perspectives that certain books depict inappropriate imagery or implications for younger age groups. Restricting access to books, however, will cause younger groups to be hit harder by the face of reality rather than easing into what reality becomes as they grow up into adulthood. Books give necessary information to children that is important for dealing with situations that appear as an adult. As stated in text 1, “‘Protecting’ children from the difficult realities of the world is an exercise of futility - and privilege” (paragraph twenty three). In addition to this idea, the analogy of ‘making …show more content…
However, opposing perspectives would claim that books need to banned due to their captivating lure for the unexpected or wrong age groups. As stated by Text 6, the paragraph states, “ When parents complain about what their children read, it shows that books are doing their jobs: affecting young readers so much that they are transformed. It’s scary to think … of a country where books are so irrelevant, parents don’t even care enough to complain” (fifth paragraph). In contrast to this idea, books shouldn’t be censored for what books provide can be information that isn’t relatively common in schools. As stated in Text 4, the paragraph states, “ ‘The community does not want to talk about sex, abortion, or prostitutes since it is largely pro-life and pro-abstinence. You should probably skip exposing your children to an investigation of the structural conditions that drive poverty and homelessness if you’re living in a ten million dollar home, and there are many of those where I come from, and many families who head enormous oil and real estate companies’ “ (third paragraph). While exposing the community to “sex, prostitution and abortion” is wrong, this then just means the minority that chose to complain about the distributor of these books are in the wrong, not necessarily the book itself. These books that present these topics are clearly made for a completely different age group, …show more content…
To those who learn of certain topics are given two choices: to do something about that knowledge of information or to withhold their comments and ignore it completely. Those who choose to take action with the knowledge they’ve gained can become dangerous, and those who ignore it realize what the impact of the knowledge they’ve learned and deduced so

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    In fact, Mark Twain, a great American writer, humorist, entrepreneur, publisher, and lecturer does not think that books should be censored: “Censorship is telling a man he can’t have a steak just because a baby can’t chew it.” This shows that censoring a book is similar in this hypothetical by telling a person they can not read a book because other people can not handle to. This portrays that censoring books is blown out of proportion because one person might not be able to manage the maturity it takes to read the book, but it does not mean it should be banned for everyone else to be allowed to read it. The same idea is also represented by Oscar Wilde, author of The Picture of Dorian Gray, when he articulates that, “The books that the world calls immoral are the books that show the world its own shame.” This shows that when the world censors a book, it goes to show that they are to be put to shame for taking away ideas and morals into the world for it’s learning.…

    • 702 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the letter "Ban Those Books!" the author takes a strong stance on the censorship of "evil- minded books" from schools. The emotional investment fueling the author's argument is made apparent by the abundance of illogical and overgeneralized statements used in just about every sentence. The distorted claims made by the author raise doubt in any reasonable and objective audience and, therefore, does not convince them of the authors message.…

    • 451 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Most parents do not consider banning books as a form of censorship when the material goes against their morals and content they think is profane. While parents have the right to direct their child's education, they don't have the right to impose their preferences on other…

    • 550 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In order for the world to run smoothly, Citizens do not need to be under censorship. Censorship hinders learning, encourages revolts, and strips people of their freedoms. Censorship hinders learning for many people who are learning important things. In this article entitled, “Reading, Writing and Censorship: When Good Books Can Get Schools in Trouble”, Barbara states, “If the parent still objects, they are in…

    • 683 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    It is odd to think that there are so many concerning modern issues that have yet to be resolved, yet educators and parents prevent their children from forming awareness of these issues--by banning books from the school curricula. Many authors attempt at exploiting these societal problems to readers, whether from the past or future, yet skepticism is unfortunately tied with them. Controversy offends many people, though students need to be aware of reality and societal situations. Keeping middle and high school students ignorant, by banning novels, is supposed to prevent prejudice and offense...but does it really help students? John Knowles' A Separate Peace is a highly debated book, whether or not to be included in school curriculums due to…

    • 2708 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “We are living through a time of cultural divide-and whether you think it’s good or a terrible idea for novels aimed at eleven-year-olds to contain sex and violence-is largely going to depend which side of that divide you and your family is on(Manning 3)”. This quote means that there are two sides in which a person can stand by saying some kids should be able to read this and some kids shouldn't be able to read it depending on the maturity level. Also if there parents or guardians allow them to read this then they can read it. “Still, parents, religious groups, and other organizations “challenge”(or attempt to ban) hundreds of books every year, putting schools and libraries at the center of the country's so called “cultural wars(Riggs 4)”. This quote means books are being banned and will continue to be banned if they are to inappropriate or offensive.…

    • 916 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The article relays stories of literary censorship in schools and libraries, from the viewpoint of an author whose work has, although received a great deal of praise, many times been deemed unsuitable for younger audiences. Hopkins suggests the importance of having realistic themes, however dark, in readily available literature, due to the positive capabilities it can have on those affected by or struggling with the issues portrayed in the work. The author also brings attention to the point that those who attempt to control the content in schools and public libraries in order to meet the standards they hold for their own children or students are additionally removing that content from many other children and teens who could benefit from the…

    • 535 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The cold ache of hardship and sorrow chiseled at Peter’s bones as he relinquished a part of himself and moved on to New England, in pursuit of letting go of his tormented past. His deceased wife, Amanda Deveraux, had died just recently and Peter was still woebegone, struggling to cope with the loss of his wife. Though Peter wielded a deep passion for books and literature, every book that he encompassed seared a knife through his heart and shot it with a notorious remembrance of the past. He, nevertheless, “loved the feel of heavy eighteen-century paper between his fingers, the texture of the indentations made on the page by the letterpress.” (pg. 2)…

    • 1127 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Censorship has followed the free expressions of men and women throughout history. The very first record of censorship was in China, 300 AD, when the first censorship law was introduced (Otite). Books should be free for anyone and everyone to read, although children and young adults may be naive and impressionable, books should not be exclusive to certain age groups or social classes. The challenging and banning of the books like Huckleberry Finn, Fahrenheit 451, and The Great Gatsby.…

    • 606 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Kids should be able to freely read whatever books they want because they can learn life lessons from books that are banned. Banning books takes away some very good books for kids to learn from and could be taking away from something they like to do. Kids can learn things about religion and other things from the past and you can help them understand what…

    • 345 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Some of the main reasons that factor the search for banning of books, according to Butler University’s Library Guides include, presence of opinions the seem to favor racism, encouragement of harmful living conditions, use of words like ‘Jesus’ as a curse word, presence of derogatory actions or images like in graphic novels, presence of unsuitable themes and also expression of contradicting view about religion, philosophies, and politics. In an article made public to raise awareness about the societal censorship, the author states: The books banned for their “immoral” content are the best to read since they speak of the aspects in humanity and highlight the errors in society. (2015) This leads us to question the true motive in trying to suppress the freedom of expression. Should the banning of books be considered as a move for the greater good or ignorance?…

    • 1319 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Part of the First Amendment is freedom of press and that includes books. Some people say “they are too traumatizing for teens, they give them a false sense of what the world is.” Another argument is that “They push a certain political view or religious view.” In the following paragraphs I will explain my thinking and why these counter arguments are wrong.…

    • 718 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Book banning and censoring is something that happens in this country to stop children from being exposed to topics that are sometimes deemed too explicit to be suitable for children. Harper Lee’s novel, To Kill a Mockingbird, keeps getting banned from the curriculum of a Mississippi middle school. This is happening for the books inclusion of rape and derogatory language, particularly the overuse of the n-word. Many also do not like how some of the characters in the novel are portrayed, and do not realize how this portrayal is very accurate to the time period. Because of the truthfulness of the novel, To Kill a Mockingbird, along with every other book, should not be banned or censored because books reflect and bring awareness to real life problems, the practice of banning books violates the First Amendment, and reasons for book banning are often easily contradicted.…

    • 889 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    These three articles prove that there is no point in banning books like Fahrenheit 451 for containing material like profanity. This is because adolescents already know the material in the book. The only thing parents can do is teach them what is acceptable and what is not. And as long as children know that profanity is probably not appropriate language to be using in everyday conversation, then they are probably going to be…

    • 586 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Fortunately, for every group pushing for bans on literature, there are organizations that fight for this freedom. One such organization is the American Civil Liberties Union. In the year 2000, when discussing the topic of book banning, the organization stated that, “Permitting restraints on literature sets the stage for attacks on all expression that is artistically or politically controversial or that portrays unpleasant realities of life” (American Civil Liberties Union). Although some books may contain graphic violence or sexual content, and therefore of course should be kept out of the hands of children, I’d like to think that these widespread en masse bans of such literature are a poor way to go about it. It’s not as if middle or high school students are incapable of understanding and comprehending dark or more adult subject matter.…

    • 1307 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays

Related Topics