He had never wronged me”(Poe 37). Maybe he really did wrong her and that’s all she could look at when she was getting assaulted was the eye, therefore the eye disgusts her so much. Nobody in their right mind would say that he never wronged them but still want to kill him. It’s just not logical. Also, maybe what the narrator considers right may be wrong for someone else, and vice versa. The “wrong” could be perceived in many different ways. The “evil” eye caused the narrator to do things that were unspeakable and clearly he/she had a madness that was not explained. After the narrator killed the old man because of the “evil” eye, he suffered from the haunting of the
He had never wronged me”(Poe 37). Maybe he really did wrong her and that’s all she could look at when she was getting assaulted was the eye, therefore the eye disgusts her so much. Nobody in their right mind would say that he never wronged them but still want to kill him. It’s just not logical. Also, maybe what the narrator considers right may be wrong for someone else, and vice versa. The “wrong” could be perceived in many different ways. The “evil” eye caused the narrator to do things that were unspeakable and clearly he/she had a madness that was not explained. After the narrator killed the old man because of the “evil” eye, he suffered from the haunting of the