Body Cameras Should Not Be Protected From Legal Cases Essay

797 Words Feb 4th, 2016 4 Pages
Imagine you got mistreated by a police officer, and it becomes their word against yours because there is no evidence to prove the mistreatment you suffered. Not all police officers are out to mistreat people or use excessive force; However in the cases when they do, there is usually no way to prove that it happened. There are also cases where people say they were mistreated by a cop, but it is not true. What if there were a way to monitor how cops interact with the public? Body cameras offer a solution to the need to monitor police actions. Body cameras capture the truth, whether good or bad, that happens with police officers. Police should wear body cameras to be protected from legal cases, as demonstrated in the case of David Muniz where he got accused of being the reason for a Cleveland man’s death. Body cameras show the objective perspective of police in the field, and show everything that occurred, whether it reflects positively or negatively on the officer. There is not much evidence yet on the effect body cameras have. However, one study that was done shows positive feedback from the use of body cameras. In Rialto, California, a study was conducted and showed that use of force by police officers and complaints by citizens were dramatically decreased after they began to use officer worn body cameras (Lopez). Body cameras simply hold police and citizens accountable for whatever actions or reactions they have in a situation, and can show footage that a dash camera…

Related Documents