The negative view of cameras is compounded if the officer feels the value of a body-worn camera is not legitimate (Young & Ready, 2014). The initial value is diminished due to inherent resistance of officers when new techniques …show more content…
Ariel, Farrar, and Sutherland (2014) conducted a randomized study in Rialto, California to determine the effect of body-worn cameras on uses of force and citizen complaints. A study conducted in Phoenix, Arizona provided cameras to officers in one district and utilized a similar district without cameras as the control study (Katz, Choate, Ready, & Nuño, 2014). Katz et al. (2014) sought to determine the effect body-worn cameras had on officer job performance and satisfaction. Ready and Young (2015) conducted a randomized study in Mesa, Arizona to determine officer behavior and perceptions of body-worn