Final Summary:
Blue Sugar’s claim about the loss of merchandise which was ruined by water damage, could not be confirmed due to the lack of evidence to demonstrate that the water which flooded the area, caused enough water damage to ruin the merchandise in the boxes. The investigation never revealed any proof to show that the merchandise inside the cardboard boxes was either wrapped and protected with plastic to prevent a mishap as this from occurring.
Even though there are no photographs to show the substantial amount of ruined merchandise had occurred, the amount of water which leaked underneath the floor board and into the store next to Blue Sugar demonstrates there was significant water flooding.
Red Flag indicators:
1. There
Blue Sugar’s claim about the loss of merchandise which was ruined by water damage, could not be confirmed due to the lack of evidence to demonstrate that the water which flooded the area, caused enough water damage to ruin the merchandise in the boxes. The investigation never revealed any proof to show that the merchandise inside the cardboard boxes was either wrapped and protected with plastic to prevent a mishap as this from occurring.
Even though there are no photographs to show the substantial amount of ruined merchandise had occurred, the amount of water which leaked underneath the floor board and into the store next to Blue Sugar demonstrates there was significant water flooding.
Red Flag indicators:
1. There