Blood Transfusions: An Ethical Dilemma

Improved Essays
Sandra gave permission for blood transfusion due to being scared of dying, deontological thinking point parents to refuse blood transfusion for Sandra, knowing that their decision in result may cause death of their daughter. The physician's legal and ethical obligation finally rests with the child patient and not the wishes of the parents. Respect for patient's autonomy and Human Rights Act (1998) require obtaining informed consent before any medical intervention. This is fundamental to good medical practice. The refusal to blood transfusions causes an ethical dilemma between the patient's freedom to receive or to refuse a medical treatment even unto death however it is also the physician's responsibility to provide the best treatment (Chand, …show more content…
A mentally capable human being has total moral and legal right to refuse or reject the consent for medical treatment or transfusion except when he has diminished decision-making capacity or a legal intervention mandates treatment. The Family Law Reform Act (1969) states that 16 year old are empowered to consent to their own treatment which means Sandra can make a decision for herself. It is also stated that 16 year old cannot refuse the blood transfusion as it could be considered choice to die. However, at her 16 Sandra is still reflected as a minor to be able to fully decide about her treatment (Lawteacher.net, …show more content…
However, if parents refuse blood transfusion for their children or young adult who is required an urgent therapy, the court should be contacted on the telephone for a declaration that the treatment is still legalized. If there is no time to contact the court, under the medical law doctor should let the blood transfusion to happen to save the child’s life as he cannot allow the human being to die for want of blood. English courts have never allowed litigation to commence against a clinician who saves a life in good faith (Uhs.nhs.uk,

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    Hcs3310 Week 3 Case Study

    • 255 Words
    • 2 Pages

    HCAP 3310 Scenario 1: As the patient’s condition worsens and his life is threatened, the physician should notify the patient that he could possibly die if he doesn’t get the transfusion. If the patient still refuses the transfusion then there is nothing else the physician can do without informed consent and he or she wouldn’t want to be sued at a later date. Physicians have the right to inform the patient of all possibilities, in this particular case, is there another route that can be taken? Patients have the right to refuse treatment and this patient in particular should sign stating he did not want the transfusion due to religious beliefs. Scenario 2: This patient has already made it clear that the transfusion is out of the question because…

    • 255 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    According to the Children and Young Persons Act of 1969, the parent can lose custody of the child if the child’s “health is being inavoidably impaired or neglected, of that he is being ill-treated and also that he is in need of care which he[sic] is unlikely to receive unless that Court makes an order”. This Act has allowed judicial intervention when the health of a minor is at stake. Beckford explains how a hospital administration can “call for a special session of the juvenile court in order to seek an order making the child a ward of the court;” and “if the application [succeeds], the court [will] likely to sanction blood transfusion”. Drew advises physicians to “obtain both the written support of a colleague that the patient was in urgent need of a blood transfusion and the written acknowledgment of the patient’s parent or guardian that he or she refused to allow the patient to have a blood transfusion despite the life-threatening nature of the problem”. This serves as justification for bringing the child’s case before the court and reaffirms the necessity of the treatment.…

    • 1307 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Ethical Dilemmas surrounding ‘Savior Siblings’ In 2002, Jayson and Michelle Whitaker, the parents of Charlie Whitaker, their then four year old son, faced a decision that would test the bounds of both modern medicine and the ethical limitations which govern it. When he was twelve weeks old, Charlie had been diagnosed with Diamond-Blackfan Anemia (DBA), a rare blood disease which prevents the body from creating sufficient red blood cells; requiring frequent treatments which prove painful and exhaustive for both the recipient and in this case the helpless, on-looking parents. To stay alive, Charlie received recurring blood transfusions and almost nightly drug infusions. Distraught with their son’s ailment, traumatizing treatment and the…

    • 178 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Although, Tom is 19 and is older than the legal age to be a substitute decision maker, he is unable to act upon Jess’ behalf and order the blood transfusion to go ahead. (http://www.advancecaredirectives.sa.gov.au/upload/home/Current_ACD_Guide.pdf pg 2). This is because Jess is not over the age of 18 and in the eyes of the law she is incompetent to give consent and considered a ‘minor’ resulting in requiring a parent or legal guardian to consent on their behalf. (LAW AND ETHICS BOOKpg99-100) Due to the nature of this scenario the decision is what Jess’ parents decide is the best treatment option.…

    • 894 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The purpose of this essay is to review the incident raised by the family for the unreasonable death of the respite client at the Sunnyland Day Respite Centre. The ethical issues resulting from the incident will be discussed, and the aspects of law and legislations in the health care facility, and the implications for the nursing team and the family. Consent, Restraint, Assault and Battery Consent in the health care facility can be indirect, verbal or written. But, consent to be legal it should be given willingly by a person who is totally knowledgeable and it’s not under any extraordinary legal control has the right to decline all treatment, no matter how difficult the denial, even if it could effect in their death ( TAFE Queensland, 2014).…

    • 293 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The nurse promotes, advocates for, and strives to protect the health, safety, and rights of the patient. You tell the Dr. that that the brother did not want this, and refuse to give any blood. You cannot give the blood to the patient because it is in violation of the rights of the patient. He has a living will that indicates that he would rather die than receive a blood transfusion. The patient does in fact die and the brother threatens a law suit.…

    • 336 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Organ donation, and the ethical issues surrounding it, has become a topic of discussion in recent years. Most ethical issues involve patients and family, but it can also affect nurses and physicians. The article Organ Donation after Circulatory Death, the authors highlight the ethical dilemmas of organ donation due to “non-heart beating” death. In such cases the patient must die within 60 minutes after being removed from life support to be eligible for organ donation.…

    • 1956 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Brilliant Essays

    Chand NK, Subramanya HB, Rao GV. Management of patients who refuse blood transfusion. Indian Journal of Anaesthesia. 2014;58(5):658-664. 7.…

    • 1078 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Brilliant Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Medical treatment helped millions of people, but there are responsibilities that all health care professionals must abide by to ensure patients’ rights are supported. The established presumption is that every adult of sound mind has the right to decide what will be done to his or her body. Before any treatment is carried out on the patients’ body by any HCP, their consent must be obtained. Consent to treatment can be verbal, written or gestured/implied. The patient must have the capacity or competence, consent is given voluntarily and covers the procedure in question and the patient was informed clearly of the treatment and their risks.…

    • 583 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    So therefore Tom would have no legal derestriction in regards to the health or well-being of Jess. As Jess has expressed her intentions to the MO if both the child and the administrating practitioner consents in accordance with a second practitioner that it is in the best interest and well-being for the minor to go through with this treatment her parent’s decisions can be overruled by examination and written opinion through the Consent to Medical Treatment and Palliative Care Act 1995 (Consent to Medical Treatment and Palliative Care Act 1995 (SA), s. 13(1) (b). Jess and her parents beliefs of blood transfusions are a highly debated topic, however if a minor is required blood and it is decided to be in there best interest a minor can be removed from their parents and detained in hospital for medical treatment (Atkins, Lacey & Britton 2014 pp.…

    • 1084 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The steps health care providers need to take in order to ensure patients understand the consent is go over treatment option, outcomes/complication, and likely of success and complications. Health care professionals must comprehend issues and trends; more lives could be saved. Based on individual right to self-determination and autonomy I don’t think that patient consent form adequately informs patient to their medical rights. Self-Determinations and Autonomy give the patients moral and legal right to what will be done to them. Health care professionals must respect individual’s wishes and this must be followed by legislation, ethics standards and overall society value.…

    • 1282 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Informed Consent

    • 672 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The patient must be competent enough to make make a decision. There are a variety of consent forms designed to more specifically describe risks, benefits, and alternatives to certain risky treatments (Pozgar, 2013, pg. 411). A patient has the right to withdraw consent up to the instant of treatment (Pozgar, 2013, pg. 412). Parents can refuse to consent for a lifesaving procedure for their child.…

    • 672 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Blood Donation Essay

    • 1216 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Background Around 41,000 blood donations are needed everyday. 15.7 million blood donations are received in a year in the United States. With there being a constant demand for blood and less than ten percent of the population donating the blood supply can be sufficiently low considering what is needed. There are four types of donations possible, whole blood, platelets, plasma, and double red cells. Blood drives and donations are highly impacting and important to many people in various communities, while donors also receive some health benefits as well.…

    • 1216 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    In the medical field, there has been a major debate for many, many years about gay men being able to donate blood. Studies have shown that gay men are at a higher risk of having sexually transmitted diseases. With this higher risk, the Food and Drug Association has put a ban that if any gay man comes to donate blood he has to be denied because of his sexual orientation. Many people feel like this is discrimination against homosexuals and that it is wrong for the Food and Drug Association should lift the ban. They say that science has evolved and the previous rule was based on previous, not as advanced sciences.…

    • 2073 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The ethical dilemma I chose is the case of Cassandra C., a 17-year-old teenager who refused chemotherapy treatment to treat Hodgkin’s lymphoma. The problem that this case produces is a conflict between two ethical principles; respect for autonomy and beneficence. Respect for autonomy is respecting the individual’s rights to say no to a treatment if wanted to do so and beneficence is an ethical principle in which it directs doctors and physicians to strive to maximize the benefits and minimize the harms. When Cassandra declined further treatment, the doctors were confused on how to do their job and how to do it well. Cassandra is still legally a minor, which means that a parent has the right to decide on her behalf.…

    • 1109 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays