Firstly, People of all gender, age, and colour were effected under the Blitz. The time were tough and people were losing family members and their close friends. However, that did not take away their hope of a better life, unlike some other war for instance, the first world one, where many people were struggling to keep their hope up and to believe that there would be a better life after it. Nevertheless, everything wasn’t perfect under the Blitz; many people got scared of getting killed, die, and of the bombs and this led to physical illness. However, none of this never brought the moral of Britain down, it actually kept it up. It made people much stronger and I think that it brought a bit of unity to the people. It also changed their …show more content…
Henry Willink who was a conservative member of the parliament removed the poor law and introduced benefits and information centres were the disposed could receive assistance in a single, well-publicised location. Henry and Rob Butler fought for an end to a society based on privilege. If it was not for them and their fight for a no poor law and a society based on privilege, Britain would maybe still have them in today’s society.
As shown in the essay, there were both negative and positive effects after and under the Blitz war in the British society and on the people’s life. Some were short effect, while others were long-term