When it comes to the result after a serious war, a lot of us have a tendency to think about the negative impact it had on the country, instead of looking at the positive impact. In this case, if we look at the result of the Blitz war, we can clearly see that it both had negative, positive and as well short term and long-term effect on the British society.
Firstly, People of all gender, age, and color were effected under the Blitz. The time was tough and people were losing family members and their close friends. However, the working class were people who got the roughest compared to the middle class. Not only did the working class population live near factories and other military targets place that was bombed nearly every night, but they also …show more content…
Because the blitz liberated the women and it fundamentally changed the women’s roles in the British society. Throughout the history in the Thirties, there was a great difference of what women and men could do. Women provided care for their children, made the food, and they were expected to stay at home. Whereas the men were off fighting and worked outside the house, for instance, in the fabric or industries. However, this changed under the Blitz. According to stylist, the women were left to run the factories, building ships and aircraft as well as providing logistical support in the civil service, in addition to assembling weapons, while the men were off fighting against the Nazis. After the Blitz, women got much more respect that they already had because they kept the country going, while the men were gone fighting. From my own perspective of the view, I think that if it weren’t for the Blitz, women would still have their role as being a “housewife” in the British society.
In addition, the Blitz had caused better economy in the British society, and some of the reasons for it was, assigning the right skills to the right task, maximizing output and maintaining the morale and spirit of the people. Britain also got supports from different countries such as, USA. During the war nearly all, the factories were run for the war effort and after the war; those factories
Firstly, People of all gender, age, and color were effected under the Blitz. The time was tough and people were losing family members and their close friends. However, the working class were people who got the roughest compared to the middle class. Not only did the working class population live near factories and other military targets place that was bombed nearly every night, but they also …show more content…
Because the blitz liberated the women and it fundamentally changed the women’s roles in the British society. Throughout the history in the Thirties, there was a great difference of what women and men could do. Women provided care for their children, made the food, and they were expected to stay at home. Whereas the men were off fighting and worked outside the house, for instance, in the fabric or industries. However, this changed under the Blitz. According to stylist, the women were left to run the factories, building ships and aircraft as well as providing logistical support in the civil service, in addition to assembling weapons, while the men were off fighting against the Nazis. After the Blitz, women got much more respect that they already had because they kept the country going, while the men were gone fighting. From my own perspective of the view, I think that if it weren’t for the Blitz, women would still have their role as being a “housewife” in the British society.
In addition, the Blitz had caused better economy in the British society, and some of the reasons for it was, assigning the right skills to the right task, maximizing output and maintaining the morale and spirit of the people. Britain also got supports from different countries such as, USA. During the war nearly all, the factories were run for the war effort and after the war; those factories