Blindness In Frankenstein

Improved Essays
8. Foster furthers this analysis of the so-called monster representing an unholy pact by comparing its creation to a Faustian bargain. Unlike the typical meeting of entity and man at a crossroads and the demonic pact, Frankenstein approaches the trope in a different light as it is not the source, but rather the creation, that goes against god. Through use of this trope, Shelley emphasizes upon monster’s deformity — the result of a man believing himself to be a god. No matter how much we suppress it, human nature is inherently monstrous.

Chapter 22: “He’s Blind for a Reason, You Know” (201-206)
9. Within literary works, physical blindness typically signifies that the author means to draw a parallel between literal and figurative blindness and, in doing so, emphasize that sight is something beyond physicality. In the case of difference between literal and figurative blindness, the physically blind are unable to see the world but are able to see beyond it, while those who maintain the ability to see are blind to the truth, the divine, and the future.

10. According to Foster, Sophocles’ tragedy Oedipus Rex “more than any other work”, taught him how to comprehend blindness within works of literature. Through the tragedy, Foster grew
…show more content…
When Foster says “the Indiana Jones principle”, he is referencing the fact that if an author wants the reader to be aware of something, they will bring it up fairly early. Whether it be something important about the character or the work as a whole, the author will stealthily introduce it in the beginning before revealing it later on. Foster refers to this as “the Indiana Jones principle” as one of the prime examples of this principle can be found in Indy’s fear of snakes within Raiders of the Lost Ark; the fear of snakes is first introduced as Indiana Jones encounters the snake on a plane before the first sequence of the film, then, when Indy encounters thousands of them later on in the film, his fear is justified by the

Related Documents

  • Great Essays

    The Creature and Victor Frankenstein are both utilised by Shelley to represent and subvert mankind’s “natural” evil. Upon its awakening Frankenstein deems his creature to be a ‘miserable monster’…

    • 1803 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Smith educates the audience on the major religion of Mary Shelley’s time period and what that meant for the Frankenstein monster. She addresses that while the monster does read some religious stories, he ultimately learns morality from watching the family in the cottage. This article is a college level text. This source is not biased because the author addresses an opposing side of her argument. She uses in-text citations, but do not include a list of works cited.…

    • 1965 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Throughout his book, Thomas C. Foster makes many statements in his various chapters that leave readers with mixed emotions. Because of this, it is challenging to give a solid single response. On one hand, several chapters present ideas that, when tested against previously read literary works, are thought-provoking and provide a successful framework for accurately analyzing literature. On the other hand, Foster makes some claims that are broad generalizations that don’t always hold up to scrutiny. Following are examples of each side, explaining how his theories work and are very helpful and how some are quite far-fetched.…

    • 1107 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    According to Ian Johnston, Teiresias replied to Oedipus “Those eyes of yours, which now can see so clearly, will be dark.” This implies that the blind person can see the truth behind the incident more clearly compared to other people, which signify that blindness was metaphorically used in this play. Furthermore, when Oedipus became a blind, he emphasizes what Teiresias…

    • 356 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Great Essays

    Can the drive and pressure to find love and acceptance corrupt even the purest of minds. For us humans, it can take years to find love and acceptance, but imagine being a revived, stitched together monster and fulfilling those needs. The creature portrayed in Young Frankenstein and in Mary Shelley’s novel face similar and contrasting events. To a degree, each character struggles with the acceptance by their creator, the publics scrutiny, personal experiences that shape their development and future. These contributing factors may be what makes people view the creature as a monster on the inside aside from his monstrous appearance, but is the monster an embodiment of the evil that lurks in all of us?…

    • 1491 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Thomas C. Foster’s How To Read Literature Like A Professor is, as it says in the title, a guide on how to read literary works more professionally in order to better understand the concepts, themes, symbolism, and other aspects, like intertextuality better. Mr. Foster includes examples from many well known and praised works in order to give the reader a sense of what they should be looking for in order to contextualize a literary work. For example, Foster uses each chapter as sort of a guide. Each chapter explains a literary element via an example of said element along with how Foster believes it ties into literature and how it is used or should be used.…

    • 777 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein is a novel about a monster that was created by a human. The monster was abandoned by his creator as well as the society right after he was born. Mary Shelley presented the ideas of many writers in her novel, Frankenstein, and this essay will explore the ideas put forth by different writers that are connected to Shelly’s Frankenstein.…

    • 1241 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Mary Shelley’s book, Frankenstein, proffers multiple meanings of the monster that can be drawn upon from the text depending on one’s perspective and analysis on the book. The book can be seen as a true story with a real monster who murdered Victor Frankenstein’s family for the monster’s want for revenge. However, this one side is only the surface of what the story is truly about. It only gives a one-dimensional view that everyone should be able to grasp from their first read of the book for personal enjoyment. Once someone ponders on the question “What if the monster is imaginary, a fictitious creature created by Victor or Walton?”…

    • 1630 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    In Shelley’s novel, Frankenstein, the monster is born into an idealistic, inherently good world, but as he is shaped by the surrounding society, his world becomes dim and he has a yearning to…

    • 1221 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Have you ever pondered your ability to read a book, maybe not, but Thomas Foster will make you wonder. In How to Read Literature Like a Professor, Thomas C. Foster gives readers insight on how to recognize symbols, irony, biblical elements, and archetypes, as well as many other hidden details in works of literature. For instance, Foster explains in chapter twelve that everything is a symbol, being able to identify and interpret them is up to the reader. Foster proclaims, “Everything is a symbol of something, it seems, until proven otherwise” (Foster 15).…

    • 773 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Frankenstein, by Mary Shelley, is a book steeped in metaphors, parallels, and relations to other works of fiction and non-fiction, featuring authors and thinkers such as Milton and Wollstonecraft. While much of this is readily visible within the book and footnotes, it is the hidden arc, or rather the twisting of the story of Genesis from the Bible, whose meaning permeates deep within the structure of the book. Shelley uses the Genesis story of the creation of man by God as parallel to the creation of the monster by Victor, albeit twisted in such a way that it becomes a type of anti-Genesis story, where the figures of God and man are distorted. The first way she does this is through the creation of the monster himself, where Victor plays the…

    • 1393 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Frankensteins work was terribly controversial. This shows that it is possible to think of Mary Shelly’s novel as a warning of what can happen if man oversteps the boundaries of knowledge and starts interfering with things he should leave to God. In Mary Shelly’s time people believed that only God should create life; therefore if a man did so, like Frankenstein, this would lead to bad consequences. Frankenstein shows that his work is unholy by calling his creation a “filthy daemon” in chapter seven.…

    • 1440 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    During the mid to late 1700s, the Age of Reason was in full swing, which brought with it a torrent of new ideas, philosophies, and attitudes towards culture as a whole. The Age of Reason was one of the driving forces and influences in Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein due to the fact that it was a very controversial book about the creation of life which was not readily accepted at the time. Frankenstein was a benchmark of eye opening possibilities and fear of the unknown which was reinforced by Shelley’s stress of God’s creation versus Man’s creation. Therefore, Shelley emphasizes the role of God’s creation and Victor’s creation which evokes the sense that the relationship and bond between the two plays a vital role in the development of the person or in this case the monster.…

    • 1220 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Many of the professional literary critiques that emerged following the publishing of Frankenstein were less than positive in their evaluations of its quality and value. Some of these critics devalued it based on its failure to present a positive message to readers while others criticized inconsistencies within the story. One article that criticized both aspects of this novel was The Literary Panorama and National Register’s “Review of Frankenstein; or the Modern Prometheus.” This paper was well known in this era and considered a credible source of information regarding literature. Despite offering superficial compliments, the author attempts to prove that this work of fiction is a disappointment considering the school from which it proceeds.…

    • 1004 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The monster is inherently “benevolent and good,” but his lonesome journey transforms him into a “fiend” (Shelley 87). The monster describes himself saying, “ ‘My heart was fashioned to be susceptible of love and sympathy; and, when wrenched by misery to vice and hatred, it did not endure the violence of the change without torture, such as you cannot even imagine’ ” (Shelley 209-210). Created with an instinctive need for nurture from his creator, the monster was not capable of living alone in his society. In Stephen Gould’s view, “Frankenstein 's creature… is, rather, born capable of goodness, even with an inclination toward kindness, should circumstances of his upbringing call forth this favored response.”…

    • 1142 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays