This paragraph will serve as a rebuttal to the previous paragraph on the basis of Pascal’s argument for the wager. He would say that the bible cannot be a valid reason behind belief because how does one write about a matter that is “infinitely incomprehensible”. Pascal would believe that evidence cannot support one’s belief in God, a belief in God must simply come from the possibility of infinite reward that you could receive from wagering that God in fact
This paragraph will serve as a rebuttal to the previous paragraph on the basis of Pascal’s argument for the wager. He would say that the bible cannot be a valid reason behind belief because how does one write about a matter that is “infinitely incomprehensible”. Pascal would believe that evidence cannot support one’s belief in God, a belief in God must simply come from the possibility of infinite reward that you could receive from wagering that God in fact