Across classrooms, districts, and states students in one school have different needs that may require more funding than in another school. In Gardner’s (2007) home district of Seattle, administration tried a system of a weighted student funding formula; which evaluates the funding a school receives by the services needed by the students. These services range from the number of children on free or reduced lunch, to the number of children receiving special education services (Gardner 2007). The more services a school requires the more funding they receive. The schools other efforts made the slight improvement found using this method of weighted funding unable to be attributed to the program solely (Gardner 2007). Just like in Seattle, there is no way to decide which problem holds the national blame for gaps in
Across classrooms, districts, and states students in one school have different needs that may require more funding than in another school. In Gardner’s (2007) home district of Seattle, administration tried a system of a weighted student funding formula; which evaluates the funding a school receives by the services needed by the students. These services range from the number of children on free or reduced lunch, to the number of children receiving special education services (Gardner 2007). The more services a school requires the more funding they receive. The schools other efforts made the slight improvement found using this method of weighted funding unable to be attributed to the program solely (Gardner 2007). Just like in Seattle, there is no way to decide which problem holds the national blame for gaps in