Bismarck Blood And Iron Essay

Improved Essays
In 1862 the King of Prussia was not being allowed to increase military spending because of the Prussian representative assembly. Otto von Bismarck, the Prime Minister of Prussia was asked by the King of Prussia to appear in front of the Budget Committee to stress the importance of the military in allowing Prussia to remain in power during the German nations unification. Bismarck gave a speech known as “Blood and Iron” to express his reasoning behind why the military deserved to receive an increase in spending. His reasoning was that liberalism was not going to put Prussia at a high position within the united German nations, only Prussia’s power will do that. The thought that power is the only way to have a united government is a thought that …show more content…
From 1861 to 1865 there was a war between the North and South in the United States over the issue of slavery. In previous years talks and meetings to try and solve the issue of slavery in the United States were unsuccessful and resulted in the South seceding from the nation and becoming its own confederation. The north was against slavery while the south wanted slavery to remain. The north ended up winning the Civil War and resulted in the abolishment of slavery in the United States. This event is another event that shows how power can result in an ultimate conclusion while speeches and majority resolutions do not help.
Bismarck in his speech “Blood and Iron” set the basis of how power is the ultimate form of control in a country. He showcases how with blood and iron is the only way to reach an ultimate resolution that is for the better of a country. War is the ultimate form of power, having the winner with the better army be the victorious party that enforces the ideals they want. The speech “Blood and Iron” was done to enforce that their military needed to have their spending increased. This speech showed Bismarck’s belief that a better military is able to win more wars and thus have Prussia gain the power they

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    World War 1 Dbq Essay

    • 709 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The most anticipated war in history, World War One, started off with the assassination of Franz Ferdinand. That event launched the July Crisis- a period of time where Europe was in a fighting frenzy. Countries were declaring war on each other, gathering secret alliances and building their armies. The Crisis was another event that lead to this Great War along with the Triple Alliance pact and Russo-Japanese War. Other underlying causes for the war were alliances, imperialism, militarism, and most destructive, nationalism.…

    • 709 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The unification of a country requires a lot of diligent work from the people, and an overall great desire to achieve greatness. In order for a country to unify and work together from another, multiple components are required of the people and nations involved. They must be able to avert crisis, war, violence, and be capable of constantly working and sticking together. Not only are these necessary, but there are also times when a country MUST be unified in order to have some sort of significance and prowess in the eyes of other countries. In the midst of the German peoples sense of national and pride as well as Prussia’s political desire, an essential need for the unification of Germany was created.…

    • 2227 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    1820 To 1860 Dbq Essay

    • 1710 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The period in American history from 1820 to 1860 lead to a divided nation on the brink of a civil war. One thing dividing the nation of America between 1820 and 1860 was the rise of many different political parties and the issue of states’ rights. Each politician was working for he advancement of the same country, yet had wildly different beliefs. For example, Senator John C. Calhoun of SOuth Carolina said, “We of the South will not, cannot, surrender our institutions,” when talking about slavery (Document A). While he was preaching the continuation with slavery, Democratic Congressman David Wilmot from Pennsylvania said, “The issue now presented is not whether slavery shall exist unmolested where it now is, but whether it shall be carried to new and distant regions, now free, where the footprint of a slave cannot be found” (Documented B).…

    • 1710 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Ww1 Dbq

    • 544 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Document C is a chart that shows the growth of spending on armaments between 1890 and 1914. In document D, it informs that Von Bulow’s speech It started a basic philosophy of survival of the fittest: kill or be killed. The required an arms build-up because Germany lagged behind britain in arrangements. Alliances could help create a balance of power between groups of nations and help keep peace. Arms, on the other hand, we’re the hammer of war.…

    • 544 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Heinrich Von Treitschke: Warfare and Nationalism to gain Liberation Germany faced the worst era of political imperial leadership, which suppressed the economy. During the nineteenth-century, Europe had many historical nationalists who studied their history and then glorified their nation's past (Kohn 21). A historian named Heinrich Von Treitschke vastly influenced Germans through his, political speech, named “The Greatness of War” shifting Germany’s perspective on the needs of the citizen’s committing to the country’s needs before theirs. My goal in this paper is to elaborate on how Treitschke impacted Germany’s view and nations mission by providing background history of Germany during the nineteenth century and connecting it to how Heinrich was glorious in bringing…

    • 1437 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The question is true because nationalism had a revolutionary impact that united people. Then it toppled empires composed of many ethnic minorities. This then contributed to the outbreak of wars in the nineteenth century because of all the disagreements of a multi empire. Document 1: The impact that the Levee en Masse had on the French people was that it wanted people to form an army. For everyone when put together they can create warriors to excite hatred of kings, and to preach the unity of the Republic.…

    • 264 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    German Unification Dbq

    • 1005 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Ideas and beliefs have proved to be an extraordinary force throughout all of history. Ideas in the enlightenment period leading to a new way of thinking, religious beliefs leading to war. For Italy, Germany and others it was nationalism which changed their history in the 19th century and led to wars for independence. Although nationalism helped Italian and German unification it also led to the breakup of empires such as the Austro-Hungarian, and Ottoman. Nationalism is the idea that people of the same history, belief ,language and culture should unify and become independent of foreign rule.…

    • 1005 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Prussia: A Forgotten Nation From the rise and fall of the Holy Roman Empire - 962 AD to 1806- ("Holy"), to the American Revolution -1765 and 1783-, there have been many different nations to exist, then split up, change their names, or completely disband. Sikkim -1642 to 1975-, Czechoslovakia - 1918 to 1993-, Yugoslavia -1918 to 1992- and Neutral Moresnet -1816 to 1920-(Hoeller), all of these are either nations that used to exist, or nations that have gone through some name changes. Much like these nations there was yet another, a German military state that started out as a Duchy and formed into the powerful nation known as Prussia. Even though Prussia was such a strong nation, in today’s society it seems almost completely forgotten by the…

    • 1760 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Secession Essay

    • 1178 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Although the Northern states and the Southern states had their differences in their beliefs, on profuse occasions—specifically on slavery—compromises had squelch down the bad blood between them. However, in 1789, even after the Constitution was adopted by all of the States to amalgamate as a nation, for more than thirty years, the temporarily ceased frictions between the North and South went to and fro once more. Thus, by 1861, these opposing ideals between the disputants were so prodigious that the compromises do not seem enticing to either antithetical stance. Henceforth, this led to the secession of the Southern states, much to the Northern states’ disgust and eventually to the Civil War.…

    • 1178 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Two of the greatest men in modern history, Otto von Bismarck and Adolf Hitler were determined to transform Germany into a great power. Despite being Prussian, Bismarck was nonetheless driven to unify Germany due to the fear of liberal ideology in a fragmented Germany. In essence, Bismarck was violent and would not stop at anything until his goals were realized with the eventual formation of a German state. Meanwhile, Adolf Hitler, an Austrian, sought to rid the nation of any race that was not “pure,” creating a utopian society based upon his radical ideology. Like Bismarck, Hitler was close-minded and would always go with his instinct, regardless of what was truly in the best interest of the masses.…

    • 1453 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In this speech, Hitler presents himself as a man who is honorable and trustworthy, unlike his adversaries. He displays a narcissistic characteristic by constantly referring to himself positively, whether it be directly or indirectly, to elevate others opinions of him. When comparing himself to Roosevelt, he notes that “Roosevelt came from an extremely wealthy family” while he “had to struggle through life by work and effort” (Hitler, 1941, p. 18). Hitler portrays himself as regular man who, through dedication, persistence, and immense hardship, gained his title and wealth. He knows the struggles that the Germans face because growing up he had to face them as well.…

    • 1146 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The pursuit of national interest is always in the formula for the calculations of the rational decisions made by a nation. National interest is something each nation is thinking about when they go into war. World War I was the sacrifice of millions of lives to fulfill each nation’s national interest. William Kirby argues that, countries enter war because of their “rational calculations and national interests”. The source points out how the purpose of war is not irrational, it is rationalized by the beliefs of a nation and the benefits of military conflict.…

    • 1470 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    From 1862-1890, German Chancellor and Prussian Statesman Otto Von Bismarck utilized a foreign policy known as Realpolitik. Realpolitik is politics/diplomacy based on practical and logical political possibilities that completely excludes morals and ethics from decisions. Bismarck utilized this foreign policy in order to expand Prussia’s rule over Germany while minimizing any casualties or war from Prussia itself by manipulating other countries and people in order to achieve certain goals. For instance, in December 1863, Bismarck after seeing Denmark was planning to incorporate Schleswig, convinced Austria to invade Schleswig without involving Prussia at all in order to maintain the safety of his country while still gaining dominance over German…

    • 751 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Nevertheless, militarism was not everywhere acknowledged in Germany. Liebknecht was one of them and he argues in this document that the military aspect in Germany's political system is a problematic…

    • 2104 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Nationalism is based off the ideas of one feeling the superiority of their country against others based off of race, culture and power. Through the process of German unification it brought about the sense of nationalism and the ideas of a nation. A nation consists of a common culture, being financially powerful, and unified. Otto von Bismarck who was the Prime Minister of Prussia at this time helped succeed Germany to being one of the top five major powers of Europe. Bismarck wanted his country to be just for the German race and work together to fulfill that feeling of superiority against others.…

    • 703 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays