Biological Positivist Criminology

Great Essays
Positivist criminology represents the first systematic and scientific study of crime (Bradley & Walters, 2011), and modern positivist criminology began with the work of Cesare Lombroso and the Italian school (Muncie, 2006). Positivist criminology argued that crime was a non-rational behaviour and sought scientific proof that crime was caused by features within the individual (Moyer, 2001). The explanation for criminality was seen as a non-social defect of individuals (Maguire, Morgan & Reiner, 2002) and one of the early explanations of crime prioritised in positivism were biological causes (McLaughlin, Muncie & Hughes, 2003). Biological positivism, as the name suggests, implies that those who break the law were biologically and physically different …show more content…
Individual positivism, in very general terms begins with the assumption that the ‘causes’ of crime can be found within the individual and emphasises that criminals are profoundly different from non-criminals (Bradley & Walters, 2011). The basic features of biological positivism include the use of the scientific method, and positivism was seen as the scientific study of crime and criminality (Bradley & Walters, 2011). Positivism sought scientific proof and thus it employed scientific methods to study the cause of crime (Moyer, 2001). Another feature was the doctrine of determinism, positivists argued that offenders did not freely choose to commit crime but instead it was determined and individuals were driven into crimes beyond their control by different factors within the individual (Newburn, 2012). In the case of individual biological positivism, these factors were thought to be exclusively biological, and it was argued that criminality was an inherited trait (Bradley & Walters, 2011). Another feature included the focus on the actor and not on the act, that is, a focus on the criminal rather than the crime. Positivism involved a focus on the criminal actor rather than the criminal act itself (Bradley & Walters, 2011). Treatment not punishment, was another feature, as crime is the result of factors beyond the individual’s control, and so the criminal cannot be viewed as responsible, the …show more content…
The basic features of positivism include the use of the scientific method, the doctrine of determinism, focus of the criminal (actor) and not the crime (act) and treatment not punishment. Some new ideas that came from biological positivism included the concepts of atavism, physical stigmata and body types. Furthermore, criticisms of biological positivism include the failure to recognise environmental factors, determinism and the denial of freewill, and differentiation. Biological positivism is a historical theory of criminology which emerged some time ago, however a lot of ideas of biological positivism, such as atavism and physical stigmata are seen as simple and naïve today, though, nevertheless biological positivism has made significant impacts on criminology to this

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Over the course of five years, the Jodi Arias capital murder case and trial captivated a country. The salacious nature of the case, the relationship between the victim and the perpetrator, simultaneously mesmerized and repulsed the public, and attracted intense media coverage. The details of the actual crime are grisly; the physical evidence and crime scene photos make several facts perfectly clear; this murder was intense, brutal, and vicious. The level of violence in the commission of the crime was mercilessly cruel and excessive.…

    • 925 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Research Paper Rough Draft There are many biological theories in criminology that attempt to explain behaviors that contrast with society’s expectations; these theories are within a paradigm known as positivism. The theory of positivism, asserting that criminal behavior is beyond ones’ control, can be used to explain why that individual committed the crime, as opposed to the crime being due to a rational choice made. The brains of violent offenders are different from other individuals in structure and in function. This part of the brain controls “deeper and more primitive subconical structures […] which are thought to give rise aggressive feelings.…

    • 579 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    There are many theories in the field of criminology. There are the biological theories, the psychological theories, and the sociological theories. The biological theories connect violence and criminal tendencies with certain biological characteristics. A criminologist, William Sheldon, had a theory that criminal behavior was more common in those of athletic people than tall,skinny,stout,or unmuscular people.…

    • 326 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the book, several extraordinary theorists and influential figures are mentioned, and are commended for their contributions to criminology community. These theories emerged during different time periods, and the book does a good job of showing the progression of criminology. The author mentions theorist such as Cesar Beccaria who wanted to reform criminal law under tyrannical monarchs, Cesare Lombroso who believed criminals are born and cannot be reformed, and Charles Darwin who suggested that criminal tendencies are inherited. These particular theorists were around during colonial times. After the Chicago School of Criminology was built, theorist like Edwin Sutherland and Robert Merton emerged, who believed external factors such as society and poverty influenced individuals to commit crimes.…

    • 896 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Beginning in 1920s and 1930s it emphasized that even though individuals have different beliefs, their family, peers, neighborhoods, schools, unemployment, poverty, and lack of education hugely impacts individuals and makes them more prone to crimes (“Perspectives on the U.S. Criminal Justice System”). However, the primary variable are factors beyond one's control that results in crimes, therefore making individuals less accountable for their conducts. Nevertheless, individuals do not act freely. I believe that crime, like any other behavior, is learned from those who surround us. Additional to that, it is an innovative way for…

    • 608 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Contrasting traits between these two is that biological positivism rejects the concept of free will that is found in classical school of criminology. These leads into the explanation why positivism criminology is formed from hard determinism belief that crime results from external and internal forces that are beyond the control of the individual. Summation: All modern criminal justice systems assume the classical position that people are beings of free will, who deserve to be punished when they violate the law. Positivism did not disprove or destroy any principles set forth by the classical theory, it simply shifts the emphasis from one to another.…

    • 1226 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Assignment Three Question One Drawing upon psychological positivism discuss the ways in which crime might be considered normal in society. Psychological Positivism is the scientific understanding of crime and the criminality of the offender. This will show and allow you the comprehension about the distinction between “normal” and the “deviant” and apprehend the specifics of what triggered the rise within a deviant and the embarking start of someone whom may be an everyday normal citizen to a citizen starting an anarchy criminal rampage. Additionally, it states that something within a ‘criminal psychological makes up lends itself to their behaviour, and is usually due to parental negligence, mental illness, horrible upbringing or other mental…

    • 798 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Aurely Nicolas February 8, 2016 Women, Crime and Criminology Assignment 1 Traditional criminological theories include: The Biological theories of criminal behavior (developed my Cesear Lombroso considered as the father of criminology) suggest that an individual deviates from social norms mainly because of their biological makeup. Lombroso and Ferrero believed that the different crimes committed by men and women are a result of their physical difference. Dalton (1964) claimed that hormonal or menstrual factors can influence this minority of women to commit crime in certain circumstances.…

    • 1367 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Comparing Biological and Sociological Theories in Regards to Criminology There are two popular schools of thought in regards to the deviation of humans from social norms, biological and sociological. Biological theories focus on the mind as the center of the personality and the major determinant in controlling human behavior. Sociological theories analyze social structure and the interaction of social processes as they affect socialization and the impact they have on social life (behavior). Both theories offer a plethora of information and research supporting their hypothesis.…

    • 259 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In: NEWBURN, T, Criminology. 2nd ed. Routeledge, pp. 170-176. The crime in which an individual commits will have strong negative effects on the healthy minds of society. It almost disturbs their feelings and consequently triggers a need or desire to fight back or seek justice in order to restore them back to their healthy state of…

    • 1262 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The biological positivism theory emerged in the late 19th century and marked a shift in the way that society looks at criminals. Prior to its conception, the criminal justice system was based on the classical theory which stated that, because everyone has free will, individuals who commit crime make a rational choice to do so (Bradley & Walters, 2011). Biological positivism was founded in an attempt to answer the question: “What makes a person choose to commit crime?”, something that classicism wasn’t interested in addressing. For this reason, biological positivism, in contrast to classicism, puts its focus on the criminal, not the crime. With the integration of the medical model into criminology that biological positivism brought, criminality…

    • 1174 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Summary Criminology studies the reasoning and factors as to why individuals engage in criminal activities. In classical criminology, social philosophers Cesare Beccaria and Jeremy Bentham developed a theory of crime that criminologist and theorist still use today (Akers 2017). In classical criminology, an individual commits a crime by making a rational decision. That decision is based off of whether the benefits that one might receive by offending outweighs the consequences such as being caught and cited or sentenced. Individuals base their decision to offend or not offend on what they have seen others suffer, their knowledge of what consequences they may endure and their own personal experiences.…

    • 1142 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    However, positivism opposes classical school of thinking because it determined and it discusses that it focus on the offender, and that he or she may be being driven by different factors such as biological or psychological. However, other influences could also drive it such as pathological factors. In other words, Positivism theory of criminology states that every person behaviour is determined result of circumstances and everyone are good, but because of what background and environment they been brought up it might eventually turn them to become socially bad. That is the reason why positivist school and its theory have rejected the perspective of classical school ant their theory about all crimes being resulted of a choice by person. Positivism theory also discuss that human beings have animal nature which is then socialised into the values within society.…

    • 1411 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Learning about the various biological, sociological, and psychological theories of criminality gave me an understanding of what leads individual’s to commit a crime. Theories of the causes of crime is a growing body of evidence about the factors that place people at risk of criminal offending. Biological, sociological, and psychological theories focus on anatomical, physiological or genetic abnormalities and their contributions to crime. “Biological theories about causes of crime focus on the idea that the physical body, though inherited genes, evolutionary factors, brain structures, or the role of hormones, has an influence in an individual’s involvement un criminal behavior” (Causes of Crime, 2009). Biological theory of criminology explore…

    • 773 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Classical school of criminology encouraged social control (Taylor, et al., 2003). The Classical school encouraged the state to react and be responsible of the criminal. The state was accountable for punishing the offender and providing public…

    • 1216 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays

Related Topics