Essentially, how a politicised subject interprets afferent tones, or non-verbal indicators, through a hermeneutical eye of power and hegemonic use of language. Hierarchical networks of command warp collective response in how an individual may perceive the behaviour of others—a biomechanical re-production of thinking. The cell of disability, is the affect of rheumaticism of the "body" by interrupting socio-economic embodiments of progress. Exactly a lack or excess, a malformation in the tandem of culture "codes" as bio-scripts . Similar to the physical body's process of apoptosis , cultural paradigms shift pragmatics of behaviour by, synchronically and diachronically, "phasing out" a disabled individual's (cell's) function in updating its "disciplinary" code of formulaic protocol(s). The re-written cell, reproducing new directive codes, leading to new corrective groupings, becomes the axis of axioms by marginalising the "outdated" and "outmoded" programmes of self-constituency: disciplinary power is a "terminal, capillary form of power; a final relay, a particular modality by which political power, power in general, finally reaches the level of bodies and gets a hold on them, taking actions, behaviors, habits, and words into account; the way in which power converges below to affect individual bodies themselves, to work on, modify, and direct what Servan called "the soft fibres of the brain"" (40). It is a process of transmitting information through capillaries of "able-bodied" language (vicissitudes of logic and awareness). The intake of sensory data through the input/output of language is then allocated, relayed, and demonstrated through the communication of the "disabled" body . Afferents of behaviour become markers of the body as pathological; albeit the "cellular
Essentially, how a politicised subject interprets afferent tones, or non-verbal indicators, through a hermeneutical eye of power and hegemonic use of language. Hierarchical networks of command warp collective response in how an individual may perceive the behaviour of others—a biomechanical re-production of thinking. The cell of disability, is the affect of rheumaticism of the "body" by interrupting socio-economic embodiments of progress. Exactly a lack or excess, a malformation in the tandem of culture "codes" as bio-scripts . Similar to the physical body's process of apoptosis , cultural paradigms shift pragmatics of behaviour by, synchronically and diachronically, "phasing out" a disabled individual's (cell's) function in updating its "disciplinary" code of formulaic protocol(s). The re-written cell, reproducing new directive codes, leading to new corrective groupings, becomes the axis of axioms by marginalising the "outdated" and "outmoded" programmes of self-constituency: disciplinary power is a "terminal, capillary form of power; a final relay, a particular modality by which political power, power in general, finally reaches the level of bodies and gets a hold on them, taking actions, behaviors, habits, and words into account; the way in which power converges below to affect individual bodies themselves, to work on, modify, and direct what Servan called "the soft fibres of the brain"" (40). It is a process of transmitting information through capillaries of "able-bodied" language (vicissitudes of logic and awareness). The intake of sensory data through the input/output of language is then allocated, relayed, and demonstrated through the communication of the "disabled" body . Afferents of behaviour become markers of the body as pathological; albeit the "cellular