The differences between the percentages shows strong language assimilation patterns in more recent years. Alba explains that in second generation of English monolingualism, “In the case of Cubans, there seems to have been an increase over time in English monolingualism, which was reported for 19 percent of the second generation in 1990 and 27 percent in 2000” (9). What this demonstrates that speaking English at home has created a tendency for English language. However, the percentages are not so high that shows the existence of speaking native tongue at home as well. However, for the third generations, the percentages spiked in regards to the levels of English monolingualism. For instance, “Among the Chinese, for instance, the figure is the same in 1990 and 2000: 91 percent” (10). Even though the different annual data remains the same, it shows the vast change of language assimilation between the second generation and the third
The differences between the percentages shows strong language assimilation patterns in more recent years. Alba explains that in second generation of English monolingualism, “In the case of Cubans, there seems to have been an increase over time in English monolingualism, which was reported for 19 percent of the second generation in 1990 and 27 percent in 2000” (9). What this demonstrates that speaking English at home has created a tendency for English language. However, the percentages are not so high that shows the existence of speaking native tongue at home as well. However, for the third generations, the percentages spiked in regards to the levels of English monolingualism. For instance, “Among the Chinese, for instance, the figure is the same in 1990 and 2000: 91 percent” (10). Even though the different annual data remains the same, it shows the vast change of language assimilation between the second generation and the third