Bias In A Jury Essay

Bias in a Jury Juries are made up twelve randomly selected individuals. These people have to be U.S. citizens and have other qualifications to serve on a jury. Jurors are responsible for convicting someone of a crime. Most cases only take up to two or three days. Jurors have conversations discussing whether or not they should accuse the person guilty or non-guilty. Based on what the jurors come to as a whole of twelve, the decision could be proposed as an verdict. A jury is never impartial because there are twelve people and they are bound to have a preconceived idea. The people within a jury have their own opinions, and share them with the rest of the jury. Most of them are very opinionated when it comes to these cases. For example in the script 12 Angry Men, when trying to convict a man of murder Juror Three states his biased opinion about the victim. “I never saw a more guilty man in my life. You sat right in court and heard the same thing I did. The man’s a …show more content…
A jury should have factual evidence to support their verdict, if they don’t then the case should not be closed. Although a juror may have experience in the this case’s subject and may know how the person convicted should be accused. In most cases a person’s opinion should be taken into consideration. For example if a person was convicted of murder and sentenced to death, the trial would have to be thought of in a deeper context.
In conclusion a jury is never impartial, there are twelve people, lives, and opinions that matter to convict someone. Within a jury there is never a time after the evidence has been stated that someone states how they feel about. Juror’s have preconceived ideas they feel are right and should stand by them. These ideas will help think about reality, and not was just stated in court case. Everyone’s opinion matters in a case to help solve it in a great