Beowulf And Charlemagne Comparison

The powerful warrior Beowulf and the great king Charlemagne, both posses’ some similar and different qualities. Beowulf was a fictional character that lived in the limelight of the people who surrounded him. He was a tough warrior who strived to be known. Charlemagne was an honorary king who lived a life of glorifying others.
Beowulf and Charlemagne differ in many ways. The most obvious difference is that Beowulf was a fictional character and Charlemagne was a real person. Charlemagne also was a Christian. He supported his religion in many ways. He made sure to be at every service, gave many gifts, and spent tons of money helping churches prosper. Beowulf, on the other hand, didn’t believe in Christianity. He believed in bards and was a spiritual person. The main reason Beowulf did good deeds was because, in his religion, they believed in bards. Bards were people who told stories so that people could have life after death. …show more content…
He made choices that would benefit him and didn’t think about other people. Charlemagne, on the other hand, did good deeds for people because he cared. He was very compassionate and understanding. Charlemagne had no problem listening to others. He often took advice and asked for help. Beowulf was the opposite. He did not want help from anyone else and wanted to do everything on his own. Beowulf was a “big head,” as people would say. He didn’t think he needed help nor did he want any.
Even though there are quite a few differences between the two they do have some things in common. They both did good deeds for people. In the story, Beowulf fought two evil monsters. Even though he did it to better himself, he still saved many people’s life. Charlemagne also fought evil, but in a different form. He was sent to Rome to help the Romans because their pope was outraged. He stayed there and helped regulate laws. He was then given the title of Emperor and