He is deeply sympathetic to third-world liberation movements, and one of most remarkable parts of the book is actually the anti-colonial history it covers. However, Anderson’s assertion that nations “inspire love” conflicts with his thoroughly unromantic account of nationalism. He diminishes the citizen’s role from participant to consumer, who only (consciously) joins a nation by buying and consuming all of the printed texts in which it is imagined. This analysis reduces citizenship to a passive and contractual form of consumption, and Anderson also somewhat overlooks the prevalent illiteracy in modern nations. Anderson’s nationalist is a bourgeois consumer and reader, and those without wealth hold an uncertain place in his
He is deeply sympathetic to third-world liberation movements, and one of most remarkable parts of the book is actually the anti-colonial history it covers. However, Anderson’s assertion that nations “inspire love” conflicts with his thoroughly unromantic account of nationalism. He diminishes the citizen’s role from participant to consumer, who only (consciously) joins a nation by buying and consuming all of the printed texts in which it is imagined. This analysis reduces citizenship to a passive and contractual form of consumption, and Anderson also somewhat overlooks the prevalent illiteracy in modern nations. Anderson’s nationalist is a bourgeois consumer and reader, and those without wealth hold an uncertain place in his