Trespass

Improved Essays
Task 1
a.)
A tort is defined as something that is twisted or crooked and is not straight.
There are some basic elements that most torts consist of. They include:
There must be an act or omission by the defendant, or in other words, something they have done to failed to do.
The claimant must have been caused harm, and the harm must be a type of a harm that the law protects against.
It must be possible to prove that the defendant’s action or omission is the cause of the harm.
The defendant must carry fault of some kind.

Torts are based on rights. The principle here is that the law gives various rights to persons. There are many different kinds that persons have, some examples include the right of person in possession of land to occupy
…show more content…
The first kind of tort is trespassing, and it is one of the oldest kinds of torts. Trespassing comes in three forms.
Trespass to the person which includes battery, assault and false imprisonment.
Trespass to land which includes unlawful interference with the possession of someone’s land. Trespass to land can involve many different factors.
In a tort of trespass to land damage does not need to be proved because the interference itself is reason enough to establish
…show more content…
An occupier is the person that is in control of the premises . Ownership of the premises is not sufficient to constitute occupancy.

One case example of occupiers liability is a case where the owner of a premises hires the services of a repairman to fix the electrical wiring on the outside of their house. However the owner had a party on his property and broke some glasses. The repairman stepped on one of these broken glass pieces that the owner had failed to clean up. Therefore the owner has the occupiers liability and is liable for the injuries suffered by the repairman on his own property. The owner did not take reasonable care to provide for the safety of the repairman for the purpose that the repairman has entered his property for.

Another kind of tort is nuisance torts. There are two different kinds of nuisance torts, private and public nuisance. For private nuisance the idea is that there is interference for the claimant for enjoying their property. Public nuisance on the other hand does not require an “invasion” of public land but rather the annoyance of the general

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    Tort/Crimes Assignment Bethany Gardner 1. Martellio Bennetto a. Claims Against: i. Vs. Adam Pacman Bones 1. Rule: Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress a. Rule Definition: An intentional infliction tort of emotional distress is when the defendant performs an intentional act that results in emotional distress and b. Analysis: The defendant intentionally broke the electronic lift, out of anger, which caused the plaintiff to experience emotional distress.…

    • 956 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Oliver Vs Brock Case Study

    • 1381 Words
    • 6 Pages

    A civil suit is commonly derived from a private party or individual, who alleges damages from duty of care. Once a civil case begins, it is the duty of the plaintiff to prove, with evidence, duty of care, breach of duty, causation, and damages. Conversely, the defendant must prove their affirmative defense against documented allegations. The Oliver versus Brock case proves the importance of supporting evidence as opposed to hearsay statements, to prove the truth of the matter. In the Oliver versus Brock case, Cathy (Plaintiff) filed a lawsuit against Bryan Whitfield Memorial Hospital of Demopolis and the treating physicians Dr. F.S. Whitfield, Dr. Paul Ketcham and Dr. E.C. Brock (Defendant) for negligence of care.…

    • 1381 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Traig Case Summary

    • 1799 Words
    • 8 Pages

    The issue to be dealt with from the scenario presented is whether Craig has a right to claim the objects that have been found. The key principle for lost and found objects is the principle of priority of entitlement. Priority of entitlement starts with the "true owner who has the best claim; then the finder; the landowner; and the employees of the landowner." A claim to the ownership of lost or abandoned objects depends on where the object was found and the extent to which it was attached to the ground. The landowner may however, have a better claim to the item found over the finder and this depends (depending) on where the object was found and the extent to which the object was attached to the ground.…

    • 1799 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Defendant’s dog bit the little girl and was found mischievous by nature. Therefore, by observing and relating the situation of the cases, it is clear that defendant Bob is liable for negligent and the plaintiff’s injuries, as he did not keep a look at the dog. Defendant did not chain the dog properly to the tree due to which the dog was able to unchain itself and run away.…

    • 428 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Halliday Case Summary

    • 921 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In Jake’s case, the main issue is whether Pam’s actions constitute a trespass to land. Trespass to land requires the defendant to: directly, voluntarily, and intentionally interfere with the plaintiff’s land without the plaintiff’s consent. By entering the land to chase Sally, Pam satisfies the first three criteria, leaving only the last one, plaintiff’s consent, in contention. Despite not having explicit licence, Pam could argue she had an implied licence, as established by Halliday v Nevill.…

    • 921 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Stand Your Ground Law

    • 1059 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Introduction When it comes to Criminal Defenses and Criminal Punishments, perceptions of others can sometimes vary. Some may agree that the punishment goes with the crime, while others may argue that there are stipulations that can be enacted due to extenuating circumstances for the defendant of the crime. In this body of work, the key points involved in the court determining the lawfulness of the use of force, the fundamental difference between the castle doctrine and the stand your ground law, the overall role in the double jeopardy clause, the basic features of the adversarial system and lastly the authors’ opinion in the speedy trial section of the sixth amendment, if it is necessary or not and the reasons why will be…

    • 1059 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Niles Case Study

    • 1594 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The injuries sustained in the Niles v City of San Rafael were foreseeable. The injuries resulted from the commission and the omission of act from the defendants. There was negligence in the city’s supervision of the school playground and medical malpractice at Mt. Zion Hospital. The medical negligence was nonfeasance meaning there was a failure to act when there is a duty to act as a reasonability to safeguard a person rights. The Plaintiff was an innocent party whom rights were violated by the defendants.…

    • 1594 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Intentional Tort

    • 1275 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Intentional torts come in various forms; for starter’s assault, this is intentionally placing another individual in immediate fear for his or her physical well-being. Then there is battery, or deliberately making unwanted physical contact without another person‘s permission. Another form is trespass; this is entering someone’s property with no permission or staying after being asked to leave. In the case of Sharon’s intruder he would be legally responsible in addition to the possibility of being charged with all the intentional torts mentioned above. Assault in addition to battery for producing harm to both Sharon as well as Darryl; also trespassing into an apartment he was not welcomed…

    • 1275 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    I see any tort lawsuit being targeted in multiple ways—one being aimed at the school’s principals and leadership team. As an aspiring building leader, I need to be vigilant to help alleviate and reduce my and my district’s exposure to litigation. As a leaders is only in one place at one time, this experiences has emphasizes the importance of building the capacity of my staff to help reduce tort liability for my district and staff. Another important take away for me was the value and importance of hiring good maintenance workers in a district. Shoddy craftsmanship is an ideal place where a tort lawsuit could…

    • 527 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Negligence Case Study

    • 745 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Hence the plaintiff shall claim damages under the Civil Liability Act 2002 (NSW) s 3b , which is in respect of an intentional act that is done with intention to cause injury or death. In order to successfully sue the defendants for the loss of earnings, Benji must establish the following three basics elements of negligence as defined by Gibson and Fraser (9th Edition) : 1. Does the defendant owe a duty of care to the plaintiff? Duty of care could be established from the neighbor’s test from Donoghue v Stevenson [1932] AC 562, where it states that your neighbor is any person who is so closely and directly affected by what you do (the idea of proximity). Furthermore, it can be concluded from Fraser v Johnston (1990)…

    • 745 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    There are four elements of the intentional tort of battery. (1) There must be a voluntary, affirmative…

    • 1778 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    After being assigned to draft a memorandum for your review regarding Myra’s accident. Enclosed below are the four elements regarding the negligence claims, and the potential defenses we may have against Myra’s Claim? There are four elements to the negligence cause of action: (1) duty; (2) breach; (3) causation; and (4) damages or injury. A defendant is owed a duty of care to all foreseeable persons who may foreseeably be injured by the defendant’s failure to act as a reasonable person of ordinary prudence would under the circumstances.…

    • 828 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Owners can suffer negligence in different ways, such as accepting false information from surveyors when purchasing investment properties. However, it must be noted that the surveyor does not have a duty to provide the owner with advice whether or not to purchase an investment but they do have a duty to provide correct values which as described in a recent case ,Scullion v Bank of Scotland that the valuers did not comply with. The owners of land must also ensure their properties are safe and comply with necessary regulations in order to ensure no harm comes to their visitors, contractors or other members of the…

    • 1023 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The following outlines the material facts, key legal issues and common law rules in Plenty v Dillon. Material Facts in Plenty v Dillon. Police officers Michael Kenneth Dillon and Robyn Ann Will entered the property of Sydney Graham Plenty on the 5th of December 1978 to serve a summons on his daughter in accordance with the Juvenile Courts Act 1971 (S.A.). The property was a small farm located near Port Pirie in South Australia.…

    • 813 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Essay On Tort Law

    • 706 Words
    • 3 Pages

    A tort is a civil wrong that are done by one party against another or causes someone else to suffer loss or harm resulting for the person who commits the act. Tort law decides whether a person should be held legally responsible for injury against another, and what type of compensation the injured party is entitled to. There are 4 elements to tort law which are duty, breach of duty, causation and injury.…

    • 706 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays