Baron De Montesquieu's The Separation Of Powers

Improved Essays
The Separation of Powers was written by Baron de Montesquieu, a French Enlightenment philosopher, to get rid of tyranny. It separates the government into three parts: The Legislative branch (Congress, the law making branch), the Executive branch (President, the branch that makes law official) and the Judicial branch (Supreme Court, the branch that explains the laws under the Constitution). The Founding Fathers wrote the “Separation of Powers” in the Constitution since their first idea, stating that every state could give one vote, didn’t work. It made the government too weak, but it couldn’t be too strong either. That had been proven to lead to tyranny, and people would revolt against the government, causing chaos and war. The only way

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    The Constitution guarded against tyranny by using the Separation of Power. There are three branches the legislative, executive and judicial. The power was separated equally among each branch to protected against tyranny. Each branch depends on each other in order to work. The legislative branch makes the laws, the executive carries out the laws and judicial holds courts for crimes.…

    • 495 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This quote from James Madison declares that the purpose for separation of powers is to make sure that not one person will hold too much power, no matter it be to make laws and enforce them, enforce law and explain them, or any combination of the three. If someone were to have power in more than one field, they would be classified as a tyrant. This is why today, we do not let someone in legislative, executive, and judicial at the same time because no matter what kind of government, a tyrant can still exist within that government. To make sure that no one person can be a part of more than one branch, Articles 1, 2, and 3 state the position of each branch. Article one, Section one gives the legislative power to congress.…

    • 467 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    During the constitutional convention, the federalist and the anti-federalist went head to head trying to create new laws for government. Many articles were written by James Madison; these articles were the federalist papers. Within these paper, Madison outlines that the constitution protects against tyranny by dividing power between state and government, by separating government into branches, having a checks and balances system, and having equal state representation among the states. In document A, James Madison states that power is “First divided between two distinct governments, state and federal.” This describes the idea of federalism, where state and federal governments share power; powers like declaring war and printing money belong…

    • 426 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    ”(51) In order to impede this predomination, the Constitution splits the legislative branch in the House and the Senate. Overall, this separation of power ensures the most liberty for all and inhibits the creation of an overly powerful…

    • 931 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Separation of Powers is the most important value in the Constitution guard against tyranny. In document B James Madison states “Liberty requires that the three great departments of power should be separate and distinct”. This show that each branch shall have its own distinct powers and not be totally connected. The constitution of the United State states “All Legislative powers herein granted shall be vested in Congress of the U.S. (Senate and House of Representatives)... The executive power shall be vested in a President of the U.S……

    • 563 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Framers Research Paper

    • 648 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Separation of powers was exceptionally important to the framers when creating our government. They were immensely worried about one branch becoming too strong and needed a solution to ensure that it would not happen. The Framers created the three branches of government and put checks and balances on each one. Each branch has a number of checks on the others. An example of this is the executive branch has the power to veto a bill from the legislative branch, but the legislative branch can override the veto by a three fifths majority vote…

    • 648 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The fundamental truth of separation of powers and checks and balances is that they prevent the government from gaining too much power which could potentially lead to a tyranny. Checks and balances help keep separation of powers by giving each branch specific powers that can check the other branch's actions. These checks and balances allow the branches to have limited power while maintaining the clear separation of powers into three branches and have ultimately created a limited/balanced form of government. Balance is described as an even distribution of weight enabling someone or something to remain upright and steady. The system of separation of powers distributes the government's power into three even branches while checks and balances allows these branches to stay even in power and prevent the branches from gaining too much power, overall enabling the government to stay upright and perform its duties to the people properly.…

    • 489 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Separation of powers defend against tyranny by separating the three branches, legislative, executive, judicial. They should be extremely separate, Madison said in a federalist paper that, “Liberty requires that the three great departments of power should be separate and distinct” (Doc B). Some examples that they are separate is that they all have different jobs, Congress makes laws, the president and his cabinet enforce them, and the justices of the supreme court interpret them. They are only supposed to do their job, not the other branches. You cannot have the president fire judges because they disagree, it would lead to politics influencing the cases.…

    • 817 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The separation of powers were originally thought of by Baron de Montesquieu, which divided the powers of the government into three branches. The Legislative, Executive and Judicial Branches were created with an elaborate system…

    • 414 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Texas Three Branches

    • 1105 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The Three Branches In order for the United State of America to have equal power, so that one person would not have more power over another. The Founding Fathers decided to write a constitution to divide the powers in to three branches. Each branches holds different types of responsibilities, but when they combine their powers, it will make sure the government is run smoothly and fairly, so that it is following the citizens’ rights. Each branches has an ability to keep the other two in check and that is how they would maintain balance amongst the three branches.…

    • 1105 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In other words, the founding fathers did not want one single branch of the government to have too much power over the others. Separation of Powers allows for Checks and Balances. The legislative branch is responsible for passing laws that the executive can enact or veto. The Judiciary can review whether or not a bill, or a law is lawful under the Constitution. Moreover, Congress could remove the president if he or she is not doing his or her job properly.…

    • 1052 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Constitution Dbq Analysis

    • 1022 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The separation of powers is between branches of the national government. In a letter written to James Madison, Thomas Jefferson talked about the three branches of government and then he explains to him that, “The principle of the Constitution is that of a separation of legislative, executive, and judiciary functions except in cases specified”(document 2). This shows how the constitution guards against tyranny because it shows the separation of powers in the branches is what keeps things going smoothly in the government forms of control and splits it as equally as possible. Thomas Jefferson was also one of the founding fathers, he even wrote the declaration of independence and later he was the third president of the United States. His past affects his anti tyranny and his view on the separation of powers being crucial to that because he had a lot of history in working in the government so he knew just how helpful the organization between the branches, beneficial it can be to compromise, and how helpful it is for the people.…

    • 1022 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Why did the Founders feel that dividing power was necessary? The Founders felt that dividing power was necessary because it prevents tyranny and ensures that there is a separation of powers within the government system, thus maintaining a balance. 3. Compare and contrast Dual Federalism and Cooperative Federalism.…

    • 1733 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Australia is said to be a democracy and seen as being about the people, and fair for all. Thus, separation of powers was formed to make sure that this is the case. Separation of powers puts the institutions of government into three different branches. These branches are: The legislature which make the laws; the executive government put laws into action; and the third brach,the judiciary interprets the laws. Separation of Powers is said to be the cornerstone of fair government.…

    • 1362 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    The ‘separation of powers’ is a doctrine that has caused much debate through the centuries, and although it is difficult to find its exact origins, it is possible to distinguish a basic separation of powers doctrine from the writings of Greek philosopher Aristotle. He remarked that a constitution must have three elements to be effective. The three are, first the deliberative, which discusses everything of common importance; second, the officials…; and third, the judicial element. The English political theorist, John Locke, conceived a similar idea about the different types of power.…

    • 1162 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays