Baron De Montesquieu Separation Of Powers Analysis

Baron de Montesquieu, an Enlightenment thinker in the early 1700’s, created the idea of “Separation of Powers”, which stated that each government is separated into three forms of governments: executive, legislative, and judicial branches. In the “Separation of Powers”, each branch creates a set of checks and balances, meaning, every branch must check the other two branches. Checking each branch makes a kind of equal power between the branches and enables, if desired, a way to counteract a decision that is either unjust, or unconstitutional by law. If both government and the U.S. constitution, doesn’t state it by law it must be passed through State legislation. To introduce information stated by law, it is mandatory, to also understand how it was created, and how the ideals, stated in the text, exemplify problems relating to its flawed human society. …show more content…
These ideas questioned the government and of what he had known from earlier philosophes, that Britain was flawed and that the American people had unjustly been wronged and unrepresented by the government they stood upon. In fighting these ideals and the acts of which the British government enacted itself to do (taxation without justification), they created a set of ideas of freedom and Separation and regulation of three subsections of government. After winning the American Revolutionary War, our forefathers, created a set of laws separating our government into three branches to prevent tyranny, and to form a thriving and stable government, but although logical in its broad statement, there are still flaws written in the