Analyzing The Complete Guide to Fiction Writing The idea of telling a story or writing a book has probably cross the mind of everyone at some point in life. For those people wanting to take that idea furthur than just a fleeing thought, should read The Complete Guide to Fiction Writing by Barnaby Conrad. This book contains enough information for beginning writers to start writing the stories that are within them and learn to avoid the major mistakes most amateurs make. Barnaby Conrad was born March 27, 1922 in California and died February 12, 2003 at age 90. He started out as bull fighter and due to some injures he withdrew from the career and became a writer and the founder of Santa Barbara. The very first book he wrote, that was published,
…show more content…
This occurs since various cuts, or excerts, from different books were place closely together, but once the reader distnguishes and discovers the style, the book becomes an easy read. The excerts from different books were placed to show the reader different beginnings, endings, and styles of writing. This shows, rather than tells, the reader that no writter posesses an exact style of writing. That all ways of writing, meaning simple or complex, are a style that is unique to the writer and no one else. All writers, and of course readers, have a preference when it comes to writing, or reading, anything. The book addresses a few types of writing from action to mystery. I consider this another weak point in the book since there's many more types of writing other than those presented but overall it explained in details to make up for leaving other gernes out. Probably the most horrid thing people could do to a writer is label a gerne over them. Writers, or authors I should say, write in all genres, but once they are labeled a specfic group they are most likely to only write in that specific group. The book might of contain some weak points but it covered the nessceasties meaning the book served its purpose. Conrad made sure he inserted enough tips and examples for the reader so they could see what he meant when he said beginings have to capture the readers attension or that endings are end that satisfy the
This occurs since various cuts, or excerts, from different books were place closely together, but once the reader distnguishes and discovers the style, the book becomes an easy read. The excerts from different books were placed to show the reader different beginnings, endings, and styles of writing. This shows, rather than tells, the reader that no writter posesses an exact style of writing. That all ways of writing, meaning simple or complex, are a style that is unique to the writer and no one else. All writers, and of course readers, have a preference when it comes to writing, or reading, anything. The book addresses a few types of writing from action to mystery. I consider this another weak point in the book since there's many more types of writing other than those presented but overall it explained in details to make up for leaving other gernes out. Probably the most horrid thing people could do to a writer is label a gerne over them. Writers, or authors I should say, write in all genres, but once they are labeled a specfic group they are most likely to only write in that specific group. The book might of contain some weak points but it covered the nessceasties meaning the book served its purpose. Conrad made sure he inserted enough tips and examples for the reader so they could see what he meant when he said beginings have to capture the readers attension or that endings are end that satisfy the