Banning Teens At Munchy's Analysis

Banning Teens at Munchy’s
Banning teenagers is wrong because it is worthless trying to keep out a certain age group when not every person is the problem. It is the business person’s choice to go there for lunch, as it is the teen’s. If opposed to dining with teens, there are other places adult patrons could go for lunch or dinner. they should just leave so they do not ruin the opportunity for the younger patrons that have done nothing wrong, teens have rights too. Teenagers should not be banned from Munchy’s, or any restaurant for that matter. Munchy's wants to ban teens because they claim they are loud, but not all teens act this way. Mr. Jones, the owner, is assuming that all teens are messy and loud (source 1). Assuming gets people nowhere fast. Sure there will sometimes be a “bad apple” in the bunch. If there is one teen or a group of teens doing something that they are not supposed to be doing, …show more content…
Most teens prefer texting rather than talking out loud. There are things that they do not want their parents or anyone else to know about. Usually, teens do not like talking in public around others about our personal lives. Also, teenagers like to send their friends rather odd pictures of themselves, which can’t be done by talking on the phone. It is unlike business people to not carry a phone on them, using it to talk about their work or keeping in touch with family. They turn up the volume of their ringers so they can hear if they get a business call. Mr. Jones said that visitors of Munchy’s say that teens are noisy and messy (Source 1). The newspaper ad also says “No music! No cell phones!” Usually if a teen is listening to music in public, he or she will have earbuds in or headphones on. Business people are louder when it comes to using their